Close  
Letters to the Editor

Andanar’s ‘joy’ bad for democracy

/ 12:04 AM April 06, 2017

Media is meant to serve as the guardian of society in a democracy.  It is a middle-ground watcher to check on government abuses or to support it when it is good and doing fine.

I beg to disagree with Communications Secretary Martin Andanar’s “encouragement” regarding the Inquirer’s alleged “decision”—whatever he may exactly mean in his March 2 column (“The more the merrier,” Opinion)—to share more “valuable (column) space” with government people.

ADVERTISEMENT

How can government officials write an opinion objectively unless it’s sane to put letters “A” and “Z” in the middle of the alphabet? And who is willing to be brainwashed? Andanar complains in the column: “Our society lacks honest, truthful and decent conversation.” True, but what he longs for would only exacerbate the situation further, much less solve his and everyone’s gripe.

On the contrary, government officials shouldn’t participate in any private media outlets—be they print, television, radio or internet—because if they do, it would be toxic to democracy. Yes, they can be free to write or voice their stand, but not as regular, “legitimate” columnists, broadcasters and owners to force fodder on people with their bigotry and obvious bias.

FEATURED STORIES

Isn’t media’s concern supposed to be the welfare of the general public and not to serve as part of an “hallelujah” chorus for any administration? For columnist Andanar, it’s different. He wrote in the same piece with false pride, to boot: “The administration we serve—repeat, “administration we serve”—stands for transparent government.”

But why fault Andanar for saying that in his column?  And why expect him, as a government official, to serve the people? Defend and praise will always be the tone of articles or programs of incumbent officials. Should we let them become “columnists” and “broadcasters” because criticizing the administration under which they “serve” would be the next and logical thing for them to do? But that will never happen.

Are we, in effect, declaring “state dictatorship” over ourselves—extrajudicially?

Ferdinand Marcos employed the practice of government officials and his minions writing in newspapers and having daily voices in broadcast media during his dark regime. In fact, he controlled all media. Marcos branded it democracy but, alas, it was its flip-side. Tragic.

But that was Marcos.

Every government has its own communications/media apparatus to convey its ideas and policies to the public, and it’s huge and free. As a matter of fact, every time it speaks it’s “news” and headlines already. Why then will any independent media outlet allow itself to be exploited or be part of the government propaganda machinery?

“Writing a newspaper column, I realized, is a joy.”—Martin Andanar

ADVERTISEMENT

RENI M. VALENZUELA, [email protected]

Read Next
LATEST STORIES
MOST READ
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Andanar, journalist, letter, Letter to the Editor, Martin Andanar, Media, opinion
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.
entertainment

‘Isa Pa, With Feelings’: Silence is golden

October 19, 2019 12:30 AM

entertainment

CHNDTR wishes to go beyond trends

October 19, 2019 12:20 AM

entertainment

A simple garden, Christian wedding for Aicelle and Mark

October 19, 2019 12:15 AM



© Copyright 1997-2019 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.