Modernization, yes, but make it genuine | Inquirer Opinion

Modernization, yes, but make it genuine

12:03 AM March 13, 2017

Agham Advocates of Science and Technology for the People expresses support for Piston and other groups opposing the planned phaseout of jeepney units older than 15 years. The government plan includes replacing old jeepney units with e-jeepneys or Euro-4 compliant units that will be imported. These units have lower carbon and environmental footprints compared to traditional models, albeit much more expensive.

While we agree that there is a need to upgrade and modernize our transportation sector, it should not be done at the expense of small drivers and operators. The planned jeepney phaseout would undoubtedly result in the economic displacement of 600,000 drivers and 250,000 operators who have no way of financing the hefty cost of the new jeepney models. According to previous reports, these new models cost P900,000 to P1.2 million each.

We also assail the intention to hand over the management of jeepney fleets to private companies that are behind the planned phaseout.

Article continues after this advertisement

In the guise of “modernization,” the government would ease out small drivers/operators to pave the way for the entry of private corporations in the management and control of public transportation. We have seen how the privatization of our train lines has resulted in lofty fare increases for profit. This is bound to happen again if the corporatization of jeepney fleets pushes through.

FEATURED STORIES

Instead of corporatization, the government should help the drivers/operators handle the management of a fleet under a cooperative system where control and ownership of the fleet still rest with them. It should also aid the drivers and operators in shouldering the cost of new technology, within justifiable and viable terms.

Modernized jeepneys have a role to play in developing the country’s mass transport. However, Agham also noted that mere reliance on the importation of new technology wouldn’t lead to genuine “modernization.”

Article continues after this advertisement

If the government is true to its goal of developing the transport sector, it should start by ensuring that domestic manufacturing of automobile and spare parts is present and vibrant. Without such an industry to provide the necessary spare parts to maintain and repair vehicles, any new transport technology would suffer the same fate the jeepney manufacturers have gone through.

CLENG JULVE, campaign officer, Agham Advocates of Science and Technology for the People

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Cleng Julve, Inquirer letters, Inquirer Opinion, jeepney phaseout

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.