Quantcast
Home » RH law You are browsing entries tagged with “RH law”

The Supreme Court decision on the RH Law

By

Duty to refer. Some provisions of the Reproductive Health Law commonly mandate that a hospital or a medical practitioner immediately refer a person seeking health care and services under the law to another accessible healthcare provider despite their conscientious objections based on religious or ethical beliefs.

Posted: June 9th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Editor's Pick,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Pitfalls of ‘obiters’

By

While  obiter  dicta  give the opportunity to individual justices to elucidate their personal views or even stress submissions which may have been sidetracked or jettisoned, obiters have the tendency to detract from or be mistaken for the  ratio  decidendi.   Obiter  dictum  literally means “by the way.” It is a side comment which has no [...]

Posted: May 5th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Can government promote natural family planning?

By

The recent Supreme Court decision on the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012 has charted a middle ground. On one hand, the Court ruled that the law was “not unconstitutional.” On the other hand, it struck down provisions that would have infringed on freedom of conscience. How then should the law be implemented, while respecting the freedom of choice of couples?

Posted: May 2nd, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

A changed society

By

There are some major changes occurring in this society that could make it a quite different one. Not just steps forward, but changes.

Posted: May 1st, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Editor's Pick,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Why RH decision is cheered by both sides

By

As soon as the Supreme Court decision (Imbong vs Ochoa, April 8, 2014) on the RH Law (Republic Act No. 10354) was announced, both the petitioners and the respondents instantly burst out with cheers of victory.

Posted: April 27th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Editor's Pick,Featured Columns,Featured Headline,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Advertisement

News

  • CHR slams water cannons vs Sona rally
  • Armed PSG man in civilian clothes mugged by 6 robbers
  • ‘Spider’ robbery gang boss, 7 members caught in cops’ web
  • Heavy traffic looms due to Sucat bridge repairs
  • Project for jobless youth comes to QC
  • Sports

  • NU targets solo UAAP lead vs Adamson
  • NCAA: Lyceum Pirates shoot for 4th straight win
  • Army Lady Troopers gain lead of Shakey’s V-League
  • Filipino tracksters aim to end Asiad medal drought–Juico
  • PH loses Barbosa, Barcenilla returns
  • Lifestyle

  • Seeing Xian Lim through the eyes of a mother
  • Creative neighbors reinvent Pasay compound
  • Don’t do your children’s homework for them
  • Investing in a new appliance has its rewards
  • Hubby throws birthday bash for well-loved spouse
  • Entertainment

  • Marital row caught on cam
  • Lyca can go to school now
  • La vida Eugenia in Madrid
  • ‘Transition’ series off to a good start
  • TV5 supports Paolo Bediones
  • Business

  • 400MW supply shortage seen in 2015
  • P30B allotted for Araneta ‘extreme makeover’
  • Cautious trading seen ahead
  • Biz Buzz: Reopening the skies
  • Device to kick the vice
  • Technology

  • China investigating Microsoft in monopoly case
  • Samsung postpones launch of Tizen smartphone
  • Customs bureau warns public vs ‘Internet love scams’
  • Sona draws cheers, jeers, indifference from netizens
  • PH Internet slowest in Asean
  • Opinion

  • Effective
  • ‘Carpe diem,’ Mr. President
  • Color-coded tears and memories
  • Incunabula in the Lopez Museum
  • What a difference a tear makes
  • Global Nation

  • Mental health issues among California kids go largely untreated
  • Return of the Powell Street Guerrillas
  • SF Kulinarya Showdown issues call for participants
  • Training video insulting to Filipino healthcare workers withdrawn
  • Pope’s visit set: Jan. 15-19
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement