Quantcast
Home » Marvic Leonen You are browsing entries tagged with “Marvic Leonen”

The silence that kills

The Supreme Court couldn’t have been more prophetic. “This is not the first fraternity-related case to come to this court; neither will it be the last.” Indeed not.

Posted: July 11th, 2014 in Editor's Pick,Editorial | Read More »

Why we should not impeach over DAP

By

Impeachment calls over the Supreme Court’s decision on the Disbursement Acceleration Program intentionally confuse the three completely different planes of unconstitutional, criminal and immoral. Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano correctly proposes that we accept the decision as part of our checks and balances and move on.

Posted: July 11th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Supreme Court in a social media age

By

The Supreme Court entered popular consciousness in 2013. One recalls how the oral arguments on the Reproductive Health Act saw vocal justices such as Roberto Abad turned into Internet memes, graphics with their quotes bouncing around Facebook.

Posted: December 28th, 2013 in Columns,Featured Columns,Featured Headline,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Sereno, Leonen question antipork decision?

By

The Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling that lawmakers’ pork barrel is unconstitutional but released the complete decision days later. The weighty question in that interim is why Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno was announced as “concurring in the result only” in the decision of the decade. It turns out that she and Justice Marvic Leonen argue that the decision does not require budget allocations to be line items and prohibit lump sums.

Posted: December 3rd, 2013 in Columnists,Columns,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

SC: Why pork is unconstitutional

By

Last October. 8, Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, Justice Estela Perlas-Bernabe and University of the Philippines administrative law professor Alfredo Molo III compellingly outlined why lawmakers have no constitutional authority to enforce what we know as pork barrel. The issue at the oral arguments at the Supreme Court seemed to be how strongly—not whether—the government should be admonished.

Posted: October 9th, 2013 in Columns,Featured Columns,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Advertisement

News

  • Bacolod mayor given 10 days to answer malversation rap
  • Abu Sayyaf given P1 M for girl’s release, says ARMM police chief
  • Third victim of US school shooting dies–hospital
  • Tamaraw population growing
  • 3,500 rookies join police force
  • Sports

  • Aces shoot lights out of Bolts, seize lead
  • A time to remember and reflect
  • Age-group wars fire off PCA Open
  • ‘All In’ charity game set
  • CV tossers too classy for Meralco
  • Lifestyle

  • Hello Kitty’s 40 years of cuteness and cool
  • Zombies take over London for Halloween
  • Cebu native Rendell Senining is out to prove he’s worthy of a spot in next year’s Bulldogs lineup
  • Dadap’s musical ‘Andres Bonifacio: Ang Dakilang Anak-Pawis’ to be presented anew
  • Gina and Racquel Pareño: Mother and daughter take to the stage
  • Entertainment

  • All tricks, no treats at horror fest
  • Beauty isn’t skin-deep for Angelica, Assunta and Angeline
  • Ending on anti-climax
  • Instant connection
  • Thespic showcase
  • Business

  • ‘Now is the best time to invest in PH’
  • Growth in money supply slowed in September
  • BPI opens office in Japan
  • Brokerage house remains bullish on property sector
  • PH turns over Angat hydro plant to K-Water
  • Technology

  • SC asked to create cybercrime courts
  • Focus on social listening
  • Co-creator of Android mobile software leaves Google
  • Smartphone sales lifted by emerging markets
  • Computers help search for the dead
  • Opinion

  • Poor and hungry
  • ‘Our place in Batangas’
  • Rizal on All Saints’ Day and dances with mortality
  • Editorial Cartoon, November 1, 2014
  • Inclusive corruption
  • Global Nation

  • Integration of terminal fees with air tickets suspended
  • Filipino grandpa, 2 family members slain in South Seattle murder-suicide
  • Sueselbeck deportation a ‘win-win’ situation–military
  • MIAA suspends fare, terminal fee integration order
  • Pasay court stops planned integration of terminal fee into airfare
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement