Quantcast
Home » Cybercrime law You are browsing entries tagged with “Cybercrime law”

Incompatible with freedom of expression

“No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.” (Article III, Section 4, 1987 Philippine Constitution)

Posted: April 26th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Letters to the Editor | Read More »

Repercussions of cybercrime law

We are featuring the views of lawyers Karen Jimeno and Ibarra Gutierrez III on the recent decision of the Supreme Court on the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, or Republic Act No. 10175.

Posted: March 9th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Talk of the Town | Read More »

Rest of iceberg

By

Much of the online outrage that came in the wake of the Supreme Court decision in the landmark case of Disini v. Secretary of Justice was directed at the portion of the ruling upholding the constitutionality of Section 4(c)4 of the Cybercrime Prevention Act (Republic Act No. 10175)—the “cyberlibel” provision.

Posted: March 9th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Talk of the Town | Read More »

In transit on Cyber Law

By

Few laws, if any, have received the minute scrutiny the Supreme Court justices gave Republic Act No. 10175. Thus, if I were a law dean, I would encourage my faculty, particularly those handling constitutional law and criminal law, to team-teach an elective to study the ramifications of the recent en banc decision of the high court on the consolidated cases questioning RA 10175, or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. The consolidated decision (the “Cyber Law decision,” for short), which disposed of several cases that was headed by Jose Jesus M. Disini Jr. et al. vs The Secretary of Justice et al., G.R. No. 203335, was issued last Feb. 18.

Posted: March 8th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Featured Headline,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

A very bad idea

By

I join those who feel let down by the Supreme Court ruling to uphold the constitutionality of the cybercrime law. Despite its striking out a few provisions and restricting the penalties only to the original sender of the libelous material.

Posted: February 24th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Editor's Pick,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Advertisement

News

  • Indonesian president gets rock star welcome at inauguration
  • ‘Military intelligence is an oxymoron’
  • Did you know: Health Education Week
  • Case of 11-year-old ‘pan de sal’ vendor still a robbery–police
  • Father killed while breaking up son’s fight with neighbors
  • Sports

  • Pacquiao scores; Donaire absorbs KO
  • Mismatch of the year
  • Ruthless Lions ambush Chiefs
  • Cobras bag Cesafi cage title
  • Donaire undone by uppercut in 3rd
  • Lifestyle

  • A ‘bromance’ to last a lifetime
  • Hospitalized children illustrate Christmas boxes for wine lovers, health buffs
  • The problem with horror movies
  • Save your skin and your eyes
  • Grand Wine Experience celebrates 14th year
  • Entertainment

  • UK critics praise Gia, other Filipinos
  • Being No. 1 is magic
  • Lav Diaz’s ‘Yolanda’ docu in Denmark
  • In the key of Mr. C
  • Spotlight on Aia de Leon
  • Business

  • Rising household debt poses risks to growth of SE Asian economies
  • Capital requirements on banks raised
  • PH economic growth in 2014 expected to fall short of target
  • Neda chief seeks increased support for small farmers
  • No BSP action on interest rates seen this week
  • Technology

  • NTC gets 60-day TRO vs enforcing text refund
  • Japanese jailed for making guns with 3D printer
  • Top 8 enterprise network infrastructure, security trends for 2015
  • Comet Siding Spring coming for 1st rousing visit in a million years
  • Facebook creates ‘Safety Check’ tool for disasters
  • Opinion

  • In his hands
  • CSW, coordination and coherence
  • Her name is Jennifer
  • Living (and dying) with Ebola
  • Recapture ignorance!
  • Global Nation

  • Aquino: Any ransom paid wasn’t from me
  • Pemberton must show up Tuesday–De Lima
  • Aquino: No need to junk VFA
  • Laude kin ready to forgive a contrite Pemberton, but say justice must be served
  • ‘Barbie’ to testify at Senate hearing on Laude case – De Lima
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement