Quantcast
Home » Cybercrime law You are browsing entries tagged with “Cybercrime law”

Incompatible with freedom of expression

“No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.” (Article III, Section 4, 1987 Philippine Constitution)

Posted: April 26th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Letters to the Editor | Read More »

Repercussions of cybercrime law

We are featuring the views of lawyers Karen Jimeno and Ibarra Gutierrez III on the recent decision of the Supreme Court on the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, or Republic Act No. 10175.

Posted: March 9th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Talk of the Town | Read More »

Rest of iceberg

By

Much of the online outrage that came in the wake of the Supreme Court decision in the landmark case of Disini v. Secretary of Justice was directed at the portion of the ruling upholding the constitutionality of Section 4(c)4 of the Cybercrime Prevention Act (Republic Act No. 10175)—the “cyberlibel” provision.

Posted: March 9th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Talk of the Town | Read More »

In transit on Cyber Law

By

Few laws, if any, have received the minute scrutiny the Supreme Court justices gave Republic Act No. 10175. Thus, if I were a law dean, I would encourage my faculty, particularly those handling constitutional law and criminal law, to team-teach an elective to study the ramifications of the recent en banc decision of the high court on the consolidated cases questioning RA 10175, or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. The consolidated decision (the “Cyber Law decision,” for short), which disposed of several cases that was headed by Jose Jesus M. Disini Jr. et al. vs The Secretary of Justice et al., G.R. No. 203335, was issued last Feb. 18.

Posted: March 8th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Featured Headline,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

A very bad idea

By

I join those who feel let down by the Supreme Court ruling to uphold the constitutionality of the cybercrime law. Despite its striking out a few provisions and restricting the penalties only to the original sender of the libelous material.

Posted: February 24th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Editor's Pick,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Advertisement

News

  • Bills in Congress seek to increase gov’t physicians’ pay
  • Simbang Gabi at the Gesu (Day 5)
  • Coffee delivery to Germany includes huge sack of cocaine
  • Makati lifts number coding on select dates from Christmas to New Year
  • Australian woman arrested in deaths of 8 children
  • Sports

  • Jordan’s game-worn shoes fetch $33,000
  • Olympian faces mischief charge in car vandalism
  • Beermen draw first blood, blast Texters
  • Confident Aces shoot for 2-0 vs E-Painters
  • Blu Boys batter Singaporeans, gain world tilt
  • Lifestyle

  • Coelho says Sony hack threatens all
  • Auschwitz victim suitcases get high-tech storage
  • DOH gives tips on gift-giving
  • Incredible performances from new talent at Peta’s ‘Workshop Weekends’
  • ‘Chicago’ ends successful run in Manila on Sunday, Dec. 21
  • Entertainment

  • 8 films compete in 2014 MMFF
  • 7th Heaven ‘pastor’ denies he’s a pedophile in interview
  • 9 films advance in Oscars shortlist for best foreign film
  • Man spends $150,000 to look like Kim Kardashian
  • Ashanti ‘horrified’ by prospect of stalker retrial
  • Business

  • 4 oil firms cut fuel prices
  • PLDT, Filinvest in talks on campus-type HQ
  • Jollibee Foods Corp. to operate Dunkin’ Donuts network in China
  • The Christmas diet that celebrates life and doesn’t break the heart
  • DM status: It’s complicated!
  • Technology

  • 5 ways to make your email safer in case of a hack attack 
  • North Korea denies connection with Sony hacking
  • Kim Jong Un game spoof ‘Glorious Leader!’ moving forward
  • Earn more entries to Inquirer’s promo and win a condo
  • Parents warned vs Net lingo: ‘Let’s try 8’
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, December 20, 2014
  • Down this road before
  • Bilibid and the military
  • Opinion polling in Myanmar (Burma)
  • Collective action levels playing field
  • Global Nation

  • Life on streets is difficult, but free, says anthropologist
  • DFA looks into China plan to build maritime observation network
  • DFA releases authentication service schedule for holiday season
  • Pemberton shows up for first time
  • Pope to meet 24,000 Filipino youths in UST
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement