Quantcast
Home » Cybercrime law You are browsing entries tagged with “Cybercrime law”

Incompatible with freedom of expression

“No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.” (Article III, Section 4, 1987 Philippine Constitution)

Posted: April 26th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Letters to the Editor | Read More »

Repercussions of cybercrime law

We are featuring the views of lawyers Karen Jimeno and Ibarra Gutierrez III on the recent decision of the Supreme Court on the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, or Republic Act No. 10175.

Posted: March 9th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Talk of the Town | Read More »

Rest of iceberg

By

Much of the online outrage that came in the wake of the Supreme Court decision in the landmark case of Disini v. Secretary of Justice was directed at the portion of the ruling upholding the constitutionality of Section 4(c)4 of the Cybercrime Prevention Act (Republic Act No. 10175)—the “cyberlibel” provision.

Posted: March 9th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Talk of the Town | Read More »

In transit on Cyber Law

By

Few laws, if any, have received the minute scrutiny the Supreme Court justices gave Republic Act No. 10175. Thus, if I were a law dean, I would encourage my faculty, particularly those handling constitutional law and criminal law, to team-teach an elective to study the ramifications of the recent en banc decision of the high court on the consolidated cases questioning RA 10175, or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. The consolidated decision (the “Cyber Law decision,” for short), which disposed of several cases that was headed by Jose Jesus M. Disini Jr. et al. vs The Secretary of Justice et al., G.R. No. 203335, was issued last Feb. 18.

Posted: March 8th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Featured Headline,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

A very bad idea

By

I join those who feel let down by the Supreme Court ruling to uphold the constitutionality of the cybercrime law. Despite its striking out a few provisions and restricting the penalties only to the original sender of the libelous material.

Posted: February 24th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Editor's Pick,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Advertisement

News

  • Former AFP chief won’t replace Gazmin – Palace
  • AIESEC Alumni gather for first National Congress
  • [VIDEO] Widow of Ebola victim talks about the death of her husband
  • Will the real road rage suspect step forward?
  • Retired General Esperon sees no basis on coup plot
  • Sports

  • UAAP men’s basketball: FEU downs UE for a share of second
  • NU targets solo UAAP lead vs Adamson
  • NCAA: Lyceum Pirates shoot for 4th straight win
  • Army Lady Troopers gain lead of Shakey’s V-League
  • Filipino tracksters aim to end Asiad medal drought–Juico
  • Lifestyle

  • Elegant Louvre Garden in Paris infested with rats
  • Nancy Binay tells critics: I’m promoting local fabrics
  • Seeing Xian Lim through the eyes of a mother
  • Creative neighbors reinvent Pasay compound
  • Don’t do your children’s homework for them
  • Entertainment

  • Orlando Bloom throws a punch at Justin Beiber
  • Women dragged in alleged Paolo Bediones sex video break their silence
  • Marital row caught on cam
  • Lyca can go to school now
  • La vida Eugenia in Madrid
  • Business

  • 1.65 million more Filipinos got jobs in April—Labor Force Survey
  • Aquino urged to back FOI passage, ease FDI restrictions, others
  • PSEi goes up ahead of US Fed Reserve announcement of new monetary policy
  • RCBC plans P4.5-B stock rights offer
  • Robinsons opens 198-room Go Hotel in Ortigas
  • Technology

  • Japanese gov’t, publishers demand online ‘Manga’ pirates
  • Twitter flies on surprisingly strong numbers
  • China investigating Microsoft in monopoly case
  • Samsung postpones launch of Tizen smartphone
  • Customs bureau warns public vs ‘Internet love scams’
  • Opinion

  • Effective
  • ‘Carpe diem,’ Mr. President
  • Color-coded tears and memories
  • Incunabula in the Lopez Museum
  • What a difference a tear makes
  • Global Nation

  • Palawan Court to issue verdict on Tubbataha intruders on Aug. 5
  • Unicef boosts DSWD program with unconditional cash transfer
  • In the Know: 3 papal visits in span of 25 years
  • No mention of sea row with China good–DFA
  • Mental health issues among California kids go largely untreated
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement