Quantcast
Home » Cybercrime law You are browsing entries tagged with “Cybercrime law”

Incompatible with freedom of expression

“No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.” (Article III, Section 4, 1987 Philippine Constitution)

Posted: April 26th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Letters to the Editor | Read More »

Repercussions of cybercrime law

We are featuring the views of lawyers Karen Jimeno and Ibarra Gutierrez III on the recent decision of the Supreme Court on the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, or Republic Act No. 10175.

Posted: March 9th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Talk of the Town | Read More »

Rest of iceberg

By

Much of the online outrage that came in the wake of the Supreme Court decision in the landmark case of Disini v. Secretary of Justice was directed at the portion of the ruling upholding the constitutionality of Section 4(c)4 of the Cybercrime Prevention Act (Republic Act No. 10175)—the “cyberlibel” provision.

Posted: March 9th, 2014 in Inquirer Opinion,Talk of the Town | Read More »

In transit on Cyber Law

By

Few laws, if any, have received the minute scrutiny the Supreme Court justices gave Republic Act No. 10175. Thus, if I were a law dean, I would encourage my faculty, particularly those handling constitutional law and criminal law, to team-teach an elective to study the ramifications of the recent en banc decision of the high court on the consolidated cases questioning RA 10175, or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. The consolidated decision (the “Cyber Law decision,” for short), which disposed of several cases that was headed by Jose Jesus M. Disini Jr. et al. vs The Secretary of Justice et al., G.R. No. 203335, was issued last Feb. 18.

Posted: March 8th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Featured Headline,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

A very bad idea

By

I join those who feel let down by the Supreme Court ruling to uphold the constitutionality of the cybercrime law. Despite its striking out a few provisions and restricting the penalties only to the original sender of the libelous material.

Posted: February 24th, 2014 in Columnists,Columns,Editor's Pick,Inquirer Opinion | Read More »

Advertisement

News

  • Police nab man posing as Army major
  • Cayetano indicates he’s out of contention for 2016
  • 4 killed as cops foil hijacking attempt
  • Conjoined twins die in. Negros Occidental
  • Villanueva, JIL pray for Aquino’s love life
  • Sports

  • Dwyane Wade fulfills wish of Filipina grandma
  • Steve Nash ruled out for season with back injury
  • NLEX shoots for win No. 2 vs Talk ‘N Text
  • Red Lions roar mightily under Fernandez
  • Army outlasts Cagayan in 5
  • Lifestyle

  • 12-meter-long-haired maiden returns home
  • Underneath, most women love underwear-Halle Berry
  • Philippine Fashion Week: It’s now less about spectacle, more about relevance
  • The ‘Queen of Posing’ shows how it’s done
  • Well-nourished children make up resilient nations—children’s rights group
  • Entertainment

  • Comelec enlists Dingdong Dantes in voter registration campaign
  • Comedy Manila takes ‘United Colors of Comedy’ to UP
  • Did Mo Twister insult slain transgender on social media?
  • Sarah Geronimo voted Best Southeast Asia Act at 2014 MTV EMA
  • Whiplash: An unstoppable beat
  • Business

  • Solving energy crisis, port congestion yet to be crossed off Aquino to-do list
  • SC orders BMW dealer to refund buyer
  • All local hotels, resorts to follow new star rating system in aid of tourism
  • Nielsen – Asian American buying power driving consumer trends
  • Regulator keeps interest rates steady
  • Technology

  • Zuckerberg speaks Chinese; Beijing students cheer
  • SC reminds netizens: Nothing stays private on Facebook
  • LTFRB goes after Uber vehicles; MMDA disagrees
  • SC: Privacy laws do not apply on Facebook photos freely uploaded by Internet users
  • Google offers peek into Bhutan with Street View launch
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, October 24, 2014
  • Focus on the killing
  • The ‘mystery man’ behind Binay
  • Binay trapped in pincers
  • The ‘unwilling’ and the ‘ungrateful’
  • Global Nation

  • Laude’s German fiancé may face deportation, says De Lima
  • Del Rosario: No renegotiation of VFA
  • PH, US sign agreement on workers’ education
  • Military assesses ‘Bayanihan’ effects
  • Amalilio still on Interpol list–DOJ
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement