I could not help but be amused when I read the letter titled “Manny to KO House” (Opinion, 9/25/14) written by no less than former senator Rene A.V. Saguisag. With a brilliant lawyer like him, I could not agree more.
When a society or nation has reached the maximum level of its progress, then it has reached its level of incompetence, as it were, and the collective mind starts to turn to other (or rather “new”) things.
Manny “Pacman” Pacquiao’s planned retirement from boxing in 2016 so he could run for the Senate only shows that one can be a sports great though lacking in common sense. What will he do in the Senate? Could he meaningfully join deliberations done at that level? For clear answers, one needs only to go back to that so-called debate with Rep. Edcel Lagman where he made a fool of himself. Not only was he unable to say anything outside the scripted questions but on several occasions, he asked questions that were already answered during the previous day’s session.
By Conrado de Quiros
The timing of the second Pacquiao-Bradley fight was fraught with symbolism. As far as I know, this was the first time Manny Pacquiao fought on Palm Sunday (our time), and I thought we’d either get an early Easter or an early Good Friday. We’d either be sent to heights of jubilation or depths of despair.
By John Nery
The undefeated Floyd Mayweather has an excellent reason to finally agree to a hundred-million-dollar fight with Manny Pacquiao: The odds are he would win. And Pacquiao has an additional reason to want the fight: The risk of losing is high.