Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Xoom

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Inquirer Opinion/ Letters to the Editor Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Opinion > Inquirer Opinion > Letters to the Editor

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  




imns



Palace counting chicks before they’re hatched


Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 00:57:00 07/01/2009

Filed Under: State Budget & Taxes

EVERY taxpaying Filipino, not only former President Fidel V. Ramos, has the right to flay Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s truly excessive foreign travels. (Inquirer, 6/23/09)

The 51 or so foreign trips she has embarked on since 2001 are definitely unmatched in this country’s history.

If we allocate a very conservative average of two and a half days for each trip’s turnaround, that means the President had been out of the country for nearly half of a year.

Of course, the President’s lapdogs have always been quick to defend her, each one of them claiming that the benefits derived from her travels abroad have far outweighed the expenses incurred.

And so, deputy presidential spokesperson Gary Olivar boasted that the expenses have not probably reached the P1-billion mark compared with the $2.2 billion and $5.5 billion worth of investment pledges that the President recently obtained during her recent travels to South Korea and Japan, respectively.

The thing is we have always been good at counting the chickens before they are hatched.

I urge Olivar to review the President’s foreign travel expenditures for any given year vis-à-vis the investment commitments correspondingly made to her and to make an accounting as to how much of those commitments had been delivered.

Plain common sense simply suggests that when a leader commits his country to invest in another country during a state visit, it is not the pledging leader’s government but the private industries in his country that eventually make the investments.

If all the investment pledges made to GMA during her nine-year reign had materialized, why are we, as a nation, still wallowing in an economic quagmire up to now?

Let’s be realistic: political leaders even in other countries are not unlike our candidates during election season – they promise something to a visiting foreign leader (that’s protocol, isn’t it) and then forget all about it afterwards. But they don’t see anything wrong with it.
—RUDY L. CORONEL,
rudycoronel2004
@yahoo.com.ph



Copyright 2009 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Inquirer Mobile
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
BizLinq