Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Radio on Inquirer.net

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:




 
Inquirer Opinion/ Letters to the Editor Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Opinion > Inquirer Opinion > Letters to the Editor

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  






imns



On Meralco website, Napocor offers ‘least-cost’ electricity


Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 00:22:00 05/15/2008

Filed Under: Electricity Production & Distribution, Consumer Issues

In her speech before the Federation of Philippine Industries, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo directed National Power Corp. (Napocor) to charge Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) only P4.11 per kilowatt-hour in light of the widely reported P0.52/kWh increase in Meralco?s generation charge?from P4.3885/kWh in March 2008 to P4.9043/kWh in April 2008. (?Arroyo takes on Meralco,? Philippine Daily Inquirer, 5/3/08)

Media reports quoted Meralco as saying that the increase was due to the high cost of electricity coming from Napocor and the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM). The reports also quoted Napocor and WESM explaining that their rates vary every hour of the day; that at certain hours, called non-peak hours, the rates are low; and that if Meralco wants lower rates from Napocor and WESM, all it has to do is buy electricity during the non-peak hours. Meralco countered that the generation charge is a pass-on charge and the utility is not earning from this charge because it is just a distribution company. To further appease the growing restiveness of the public, Meralco explained that it has been transparent and urged the public to visit their website which shows the rates coming from their different sources of electricity.

In preparation for the Consultative Meeting, organized by the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) upon the request of EMPOWER, of which the National Association of Electric Consumers for Reforms (NASECORE) is part of, I visited the Meralco website and printed the page showing its generation charge (according to each source) for April 2008. Surprisingly and contrary to the claims of Meralco, the Napocor rate appearing on the website was only P4.01/kWh as against the P4.90/kWh generation charge that Meralco billed its customers. Under Sec. 4 of Republic Act 9209 (Meralco franchise) and Sec. 23 of the Electric Power Industry Reform Act, Meralco is obliged to supply its captive customers with electricity in the least-cost manner.

It would not take a college graduate to understand that the least cost supply of electricity in this instance was the Napocor rate of P4.01/kWh, and this should have been the rate billed to the 4.4 million Meralco customers, not the P4.90/kWh which was P0.89/kWh higher.

In light of this, we believe we were misled if not deceived by Meralco when it announced that the reason for the P0.52/kWh increase in its generation charge in April 2008 was the high rates of Napocor and WESM. We also believe that we should have been charged only the Napocor rate of P4.01/kWh which is the least cost and that the P0.89/kWh excess charge should be refunded to the Meralco customers. We hope the ERC will share the position of NASECORE and use its ?motu proprio? powers to direct Meralco to refund the over-billing and impose the corresponding penalty. Should ERC advise us that a petition is necessary, we will gladly file one.

PETE L. ILAGAN, president, National Association of Electricity Consumers for Reforms, Inc. (NASECORE), Tambo, Parañaque City



Copyright 2014 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:


  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2014 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Inquirer Mobile
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
BizLinq