Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us
SEARCH WEB INQUIRER Powered by: Google
Fri, Jul 25, 2008 02:23 AM Philippines      25°C to 33°C
  HOME       NEWS     SPORTS     SHOWBIZ AND STYLE      TECHNOLOGY     BUSINESS     OPINION      GLOBAL NATION    SERVICES
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
You
BizLinq

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Inquirer Opinion/ Letters to the Editor Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Opinion > Inquirer Opinion > Letters to the Editor

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Comment on this article on our Vox Populi blog  

  RELATED STORIES  




imns



Political hype, not factual revelation


Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 22:14:00 05/13/2008

“Horrific treetop condos in Subic forest, a monument to deceit”? (Philippine Daily Inquirer, 4/6/08)

All natural ecosystems, including the Subic watershed, are complex. That’s why proposed projects that can impact on the ecosystem are required to have an exhaustive Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), so that an independent technical review team can recommend mitigation measures that would allow the project to merit an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) with conditions that must be enforced. Former secretaries of environment Angel Alcala and Mike Defensor both signed agreements with the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA) allowing the latter to exercise environmental self-regulation by having its Ecology Center perform the EIS on projects under SBMA jurisdiction.

“It’s horrific! 75 percent of our rainforest has disappeared. This same thing is happening here,” an environmental NGO head said.

“An ammunitions and explosive testing area, warehouses and bunkhouses used to stand in that area. There were no trees anymore,” Sen. Richard Gordon, a former SBMA chief, described the area’s nearly 50 years’ use by the US Navy, thus correcting the emotional hype that the condos were built in the middle of the rainforest after cutting forest trees.

But the good senator, usually sober, spoiled his factual revelation by going into political hype, defending SBMA head Armand Arreza and laying the blame on Ecology Center chief, Ameth Kovak who, he said, is unqualified to hold the post and was a “political” appointee of former SBMA chief Felicito Payumo. It may be recalled that Gordon doggedly resisted Payumo’s takeover of SBMA. Ms Kovak has been retained in her position by four SBMA chiefs who came after Gordon.

We, the undersigned environmental movement leaders, deplore the liberal use of emotional and political hype instead of 100-percent facts in this issue. The cold light of knowledge, not the heat of such hype, is needed to protect, conserve and preserve our beautiful and rich natural resources.

We recommend that incumbent Environment Secretary Joselito Atienza amend the provision on SBMA’s environmental “autonomy” to allow oversight review by the Region III director of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, who chairs the Protected Area Management Board (PAMB) of Bataan National Park where the 8,000-ha Subic watershed is located in Morong. For starters, the PAMB should constitute a Multipartite Monitoring Team (MMT) to ensure ECC compliance by Hanjin, the condo builders, considering that the condos’ three-hectare site is only two kilometers away from the core of the forest. Note that Hanjin started the construction activities before it got the ECC.

ROGER C. BIROSEL, ROLANDO SONCUYA, YOYONG MAGDARAOG, KAREN TAÑADA



Copyright 2008 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


SHARE THIS ARTICLE:
Digg this story    Blink List    Blink Bits    add to my del.icio.us    Reddit   Yahoo MyWeb Yahoo MyWeb


RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2008 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Inquirer Mobile
Jobmarket Online
PDI
Inquirer VDO