Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Xoom

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:



Affiliates

 
Inquirer Opinion/ Editorial Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Opinion > Inquirer Opinion > Editorial

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  

GALLERY
 
Zoom ImageZoom   

EDITORIAL CARTOON





imns


Editorial
Clawless opinion


Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 22:32:00 01/03/2009

Filed Under: Sport, Golf, Golf club mauling incident, Internet, Conflicts (general)

THE great divide between officials and the public can be found in one simple sentence. “I appeal to the bloggers to stop this ... I hope this doesn’t happen to you bloggers,” said Agrarian Reform Secretary Nasser Pangandaman, reacting to how the story of confrontation between his sons and the Dela Paz family at the Valley Golf Club won’t go away. Instead of pouring oil on troubled waters, Pangandaman’s appeal was more like pouring gasoline on the roaring flames of public opinion.

The official incident report submitted by Valley Golf’s security agency on Dec. 27, as reproduced online in the blog of Ding Gagelonia, bears quoting at length (fractured English and all): “On or about 1330 Hrs yesterday (Dec. 26, 2008) Argument occurred at hole no 06 South Course that resulted to physical injury involving Mayor Nasser Pangandaman Jr. and Sec. Nasser Pangandaman Sr. The physical injury victims are Mr. Delfin dela Paz Sr. and his son Bino Lorenzo dela Paz, 14 yrs. old.

“The victims and suspects of physical injury were all playing Golf at the time, but based on the statement of VGCCI Marshall/Starter ... at that time he talk already both parties but suddenly he was not expected that argument was not settled.

“Based on the statement of the caddy of Mayor Nasser Pangandaman … that he saw Mayor Pangandaman and Mr. Delfin dela Paz was talking conversation that resulted to trouble.

“According to our guard on Duty at Lobby… that the Registration Dept. called to him for assistance at Lower Veranda and he immediately proceeds to the area but upon reaching at the incident scene he saw Mr. Delfin dela Paz Sr. was bloodied his face and his 14 yrs old son ... was bloodied also his left side ears and many personal bodyguards of Mayor Pangandaman wearing civilian clothes armed with high power guns.”

This official account doesn’t necessarily contradict, but doesn’t necessarily confirm either, the emotionally charged accounts of the confrontation given by the Dela Pazes and the Pangandamans. But it does focus on issues that have galvanized public opinion, at least on the Internet, and to the extent that it was reported overseas. The primary issue, perhaps, is 14-year-old Bino dela Paz being beaten up. As many an outraged blogger and commenter on the Internet has put it, regardless of what actually led to the beating up, the assault on a minor is simply unpardonable. The secondary issue is how public anger over the incident hasn’t led to more than pro forma apologies from Secretary Pangandaman (and silence on the part of his son, the mayor).

Indeed, in the version of Bambee dela Paz—in her blog entry, which caused such a stir both online and off—the issue can be boiled down to that line allegedly uttered by Mayor Pangandaman: “Don’t you know who I am?” This is the sort of line that crystallizes an incident for many people, because they have had encounters with precisely the sort of sense of entitlement that leads public officials to use that line to dodge responsibility or play by the rules. For older Filipinos, the line used to be, “What are we in power for?” The line outraged citizens then; it’s contemporary version outrages citizens today.

It has outraged enough citizens for the story to keep on going. On Monday, even as Secretary Pangandaman, who wanted to prove his clout by spending the rest of the holidays in President Macapagal-Arroyo’s company, basks in her favor in the Cabinet meeting in Lanao, the case may be joined by the Dela Pazes formally filing charges. No one knows, of course, whether it will prosper or not; but for many, and their number may be growing, the case is a simple one, politically speaking. Pangandaman, according to Ang Kapatiran, should simply resign; his son, suspended.

Unlikely. Even at the height of the emotionalism triggered by the issue, the President never showed any signs of worrying about public opinion. Hers is a government completely oblivious to public outrage, because they can and will stonewall calls for resignation and drag out cases in court until the Dela Pazes are bankrupted or, when public attention wanes, intimidate them into settling the case.



Copyright 2009 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:


  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Inquirer Mobile
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
BizLinq