Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us
 
Thu, Jan 08, 2009 05:16 PM Philippines      25°C to 33°C
  HOME       NEWS     SPORTS     SHOWBIZ AND STYLE      TECHNOLOGY     BUSINESS     OPINION      GLOBAL NATION    SERVICES
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Eton Properties
INQ GAMES

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

LOTTO
2 Digit Result: 13 24
3 Digit: 1 8 7 • 2 5 2 • 9 1 4
4 Digit: 6 7 4 5
MegaLotto 6/45 Winning Numbers:
17 14 18 35 03 08
P 18,591,193.80

Affiliates

 
Inquirer Opinion/ Columns Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > Opinion > Inquirer Opinion > Columns

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  




 OTHER COLUMNS


imns


Youngblood
Bundy robots

By N.L. Pardo
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 01:33:00 06/26/2008

Filed Under: Human Interest

Upon arriving at the workplace, before they eat lunch, and before they leave for home, employees line up in front of a mechanical timepiece that tracks the hours they have worked. This is an everyday scene in every office anywhere in the world, and the government agency where I work is not an exemption. At the end of every working day, we prepare to leave early and hastily line up in front of the biometric machine. We are excited to go home, enjoy a good dinner, and get some sleep. My officemates, mostly parents, long for the hugs and kisses of their children at the end of a tiring day. But before we can enjoy the pleasures of coming home, we have to put some extra time lining up before the stupid machine. Those who want to get home early, line up early.

This stupid machine is known as a bundy clock. It is said to be named after a jeweler in New York, who invented it. A few years later after it was invented, the clock began to be mass produced. Then it started to move away from the mechanical version to a computer-based, time-tracking system.

Today, relatives of that machine proliferate. One is the magnetic card that needs to be swiped in a machine. Another is a biometric clock that scans fingerprints. The machine may now come in many forms, but what has not changed is that it is an instrument for control of employees. I am sure that if the machine were a living thing, it would swell with pride for having god-like powers. It enslaves and debases employees who are compelled to start and end their day by pressing their fingers to a scanner that logs the precise time of their arrival or departure.

They say that the machine streamlines payroll operations by providing the timekeeper with official records of the hours worked for easier computation. I say that the system of clocking in and out is demeaning because it is based in mistrust. It is a bureaucratic intrusion on professionals who should have the freedom to put in extra time on work assignments they love doing and enjoy a little flexibility regarding their work hours.

Recently, I came across a newspaper ad inviting company managers to a symposium on how to spot creative employees. I think picking creative individuals among job applicants is quite easy. What is difficult is maintaining the creativity of the hired employees. And in this regard, scrapping the system of clocking in and out would help greatly.

Why? Because a creative workforce is not one that punches in and punches out. The system transforms creative employees into robots. Slowly, they become mechanical devices that operate automatically and perform boring jobs. They execute tasks by following a set of instructions that specifies exactly what they must do to complete the job. Little by little, their minds become used to routine and eventually they will lose their imagination.

I do not intend to be trapped in this system. I want to have a business of my own and work at my own pace. I want the little creativity that I have to develop. More importantly, I want to spend ample time with the family I will soon have. I don’t want to leave my children under the care of a nanny, and I don’t want to miss any single detail in their life as they grow up. I guess everyone wants the same thing, because nobody wants to be a robot.

N.L. Pardo, 21, plans to put up a business someday with M, her partner.



Copyright 2009 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:

COLUMNS:

  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Inquirer Mobile
Jobmarket Online
Inquirer VDO
BizLinq