Quantcast

There’s The Rub

Wait just a minute

By |


It’s just shamelessness. Or pagkagarapal, as the Tagalog puts it better. Shortly after saying “we are sorry” for “the apparent inconsistency of our actions with our pastoral preaching,” the bishops have taken the offensive and now demand that P-Noy (President Aquino) and Margie Juico resign.

For freaking what? The bishops say for “dragging the Church” into this mess. Specifically, in the case of Juico, for calling the bishops identified by the COA as having solicited or received SUVs from the PCSO “Pajero bishops.” And in the case of P-Noy, for taking the lead in defaming the Church. “The anti-Catholic Church campaign,” says Bishop Jose Collin Bagaforo, “has Aquino’s green light. Shall we just let this thing happen? Let’s make a stand for our faith.”

When did Juico ever call the culprits “Pajero bishops”? When in any utterance before the newspapers, TV and radio, before an audience in a speech, before friends and enemies in informal banter did she ever use the phrase “Pajero bishops”? That term is an invention of media.

In any case, what, the “Strada bishops” makes it better? The “4×4 bishops” makes it better? The “SUV bishops” makes it better?

We only have their word they used their solicitations to give to the poor. Which has got to be the most idiotic justification ever to be offered for that behavior. Idiotic at the very least because of the association between SUVs and serving the poor. Those concepts do not reconcile, they contradict. The notion that people who obsess with SUVs should be interested in any way with helping the poor can only come from the mind of, well, a Pajero bishop.

Idiotic at the very most because of the association between Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and serving the poor. Those concepts do not jibe, they clash. The notion that people who obsess about SUVs, enough to ask for them as birthday gifts from Arroyo, have only the interests of the poor in mind should be enough to spark a rebellion of the poor for the insult added to the injury. Had Capalla, Pueblos, et al. simply not asked for the SUVs, had they simply not asked for them from Arroyo, had they simply not asked for them from Arroyo in exchange for propping up her rule, they would not just have made the poor less poor, they would have made them positively rich.

Which brings me to the heart of the matter. The way Arroyo’s bishops are alternately whining and chortling now, you’d think they were wrongly accused. In fact, they were not wrongly accused, they were lightly accused.

Their real crime was not soliciting or receiving SUVs and other gratuities from Arroyo, the devil alone knows toward what end (God cannot possibly have anything to do with it). Their real crime was what they gave in exchange for them. That was their “constant support,” as Pueblos put it. That was their unwavering refusal to condemn a rule that arose from the still smoldering ashes of cheating. (Zaldy Ampatuan has quite a mouthful to say about that, by the way.) That was their iron resolve to thwart any move to oust a ruler who had no mandate from heaven or earth, from their God or their flock.

Of course they got so little compared to the senators, congressmen, generals, businessmen and media men who also came to Arroyo’s side and got more than SUVs for their pains. That only makes them cheap, that doesn’t make them innocent.

But that also shows why the bishops will always get off lightly—or, as in this case, feeling vindicated—in a Senate hearing. Lest we forget, Juan Ponce Enrile was the biggest beneficiary of Arroyo’s rule. Miriam Defensor-Santiago is the second biggest beneficiary of Arroyo’s rule. After being the biggest and second biggest beneficiaries of Erap’s rule. You expect them to want to scrutinize, probe, investigate, interrogate and otherwise dwell on the bishops selling their souls for SUVs? One thing you can say about Enrile and Santiago: They did not come cheap. Well, there’s yet another thing you can say about them: They got so much for having no souls left to sell.

It’s not P-Noy who is leading an “anti-Catholic campaign,” it’s Arroyo’s bishops themselves. It’s not Margie Juico who has “dragged the Catholic Church” into this mess, it’s Arroyo’s bishops themselves. What gall to imagine they are the Catholic Church. What spleen to imagine they represent the bishopric at all. What bile to call on the faithful to defend their faith.

What is our faith? God is not the truth and the light but the lie and the darkness? Whenever two or three are gathered in Gloria’s name, there I am in the midst of them? Give unto Gloria what is FPJ’s and to the bishops what is taxpayers’ money? That is our faith?

Read our lips: This is not an attack on the Church, this is an attack on you. This is no more an attack on the Philippine Catholic Church than an attack on Arroyo is an attack on the Philippine State. This is an attack you more than richly deserve.

Not least by defaming the Church of Jaime Cardinal Sin, a church that could still distinguish truth from lie, light from darkness. Not least by tarnishing the Church of Francisco Claver, Antonio Fortich, Sergio Utleg, Miguel Purruganan, Antonio Ledesma, and Julio Labayen, a church that could still distinguish rich from poor, God from Mammon. Not least by trashing the memory of all the priests and nuns, the bishops and lay workers, who marched with the poor, fists raised in solidarity and voices sounded like trumpets at the walls of tyranny, reminding the faithful they had a faith, and their faith made them strong, and their faith made them free.

The PCSO should apologize to you? Mahiya-hiya kayo sa mga balat n’yo. At least Angelo Reyes had the decency to shoot himself in the heart.

When are you going to jump off the bell tower for the greater glory of God?


Follow Us




More from this Column:




Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=7991

  • http://twitter.com/tenseoiltoys Andy Dufresne

    Sobrang init ng baliktaktakan kahapon, nasunog yung intensedebate script.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZUYZ6O7GXTRB7IRRJXUIM4OUWU Maria Clarice Marcelo

    very enlightening … i just hope the message reaches each and every part of this body of Christ we call the Catholic Church especially the so-called blind followers

  • Vince B

    Introducing the Mitsubishop Damaso – the newest model of SUV with 4×4 drive and the horsepower of forsaken souls to drive any bishop way up to moral high ground. Only P1,800,000.

    For interested parties. Just ask for your local trapo or their PCSO cronies, they even accept birthday surprises. Guaranteed immediate delivery, faster than saying emergency medical services for people in need.

    With a lifetime warranty from God

    • Anonymous

      Pajero columnist De Quiros wouldn’t want PNoy to apologize to the
      bishops. After all, PNoy appointed his brother to a lucrative GOCC
      position. That’s worth more than 8 Pajeros mind you. 

      • Anonymous

        Para kang plakang sira rhenxo. Obispo mo mga kurakot at sila pa tong nag demand ng apology galing sa Presidente. Sila ang sumira ng simbahang katoliko at hindi si Aquino. Intindihan mo?

  • Jessie Saclo III

    These bishops are indeed shameless for dragging the church into “their” mess. This recent blame against Pnoy and Juico is purely an abuse of power to cover their condemned minds. 

    • Anonymous

      Pajero columnist De Quiros wouldn’t want PNoy to apologize to the
      bishops. After all, PNoy appointed his brother to a lucrative GOCC
      position. That’s worth more than 8 Pajeros mind you. 

  • Anonymous

    Pajero columnist De Quiros wouldn’t want PNoy to apologize to the bishops. After all, PNoy appointed his brother to a lucrative GOCC position. That’s worth more than 8 Pajeros mind you.

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/657IN22QDFOSPRNZ7KWLQPWFFA Djinn

      So much about de Quiros. Now what can you say about the bishops?

    • Anonymous

      What is there to apologize? It is the bishop who are very critical to Aquino hmmm i wonder why?? is it because Aquino can’t provide a montero/pajero?

  • http://www.facebook.com/janfd Jan Floyd Denamarca

    GOD I’M ASKING FOR YOUR FORGIVENESS IN BEHALF OF THE BISHOPS… THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING….. mga bishops naman, please kung ipinanganak kayo nang nanay nyo na may utak, gamitin nyo naman poh…

    alam ko na ang mga bishops has a high rank and responsibility in leading the filipinos to the right path… but still all are equal in the eyes of GOD. wag sana sila umasta na parang sino. ayaw ko rin sa RH pero mas ayaw ko ang ugali ng mapagmataas na tao… logically speaking ang bishop ay tao rin.. kaya di imposibleng may wangwang din dyan… may kilala ako sa amin na wangwang (corrupt) na pari… at sure ako maraming katulad pa sa buong bansa



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace