Sounding Board

Of PDAF and other matters

A+
A
A-

In 1994, the constitutionality of the pork barrel fund was challenged on the ground of violation of the rule that, although appropriating money is the function of Congress, spending it is the prerogative of the executive branch. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the fund. It said that what the law allowed members of Congress to do was simply to recommend projects. If the recommended projects qualified for funding under the Countrywide Development Fund, it was the president who would implement them.

The latest Priority Development Assistance Fund is found under the 2013 General Appropriations Act. Its constitutionality is now also being challenged. What defect in the PDAF Law makes it unconstitutional?

The law specifies the total amount to be appropriated, identifies the implementing agencies, specifies the individual amounts that can be identified by legislators (P70 million for representatives, P200 million for senators), and identifies the potential recipients. If realignment is needed, the rules for realignment are set in the law pursuant to a constitutional requirement for transfer of funds. A request for release of funds  must be supported by required documents and endorsed by the committee on finance of the House or the Senate. The release is made by the identified agencies. The Department of Budget and Management and the respective agencies are responsible for posting the identity of the proponent legislators, the name of the projects, the names of the beneficiaries, the program evaluation and the assessment report, the authorized realignment if any, and procurements made under the fund.

Obviously, something went wrong. What went wrong and whose fault was it? We will be waiting for what the Supreme Court will say.

Suspension of legislators.  The rule on the discipline of members of Congress is found in Article VI, Section 16(3): “Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all its Members, suspend or expel a Member. A penalty of suspension, when imposed, shall not exceed sixty days.”

Inherent in any legislative body is its power of internal regulation and discipline. As Justice Joseph Story said, “If the power did not exist, it would be utterly impracticable to transact the business of the nation, either at all, or at least with decency, deliberation, and order. The humblest assembly of men is understood to possess this power; and it would be absurd to deprive the councils of the nation of a like authority.”

What stands out from the jurisprudence on the subject is that, except for some limitations of detail found in the Constitution itself, there is a clear recognition of the overall autonomy of the legislative body both in the formulation and in the application of its rules.

On the question whether a legislator’s action constitutes disorderly behavior, jurisprudence says “that the House is the judge of what constitutes disorderly behavior… The theory of separation of powers, fastidiously observed by this Court, demands in such situation a prudent refusal to interfere.”

On the question of whether a legislator under investigation should voluntarily go on leave, that is for the individual legislator to decide. We should also keep in mind that, like every person, legislators have the constitutional right to be presumed innocent until guilt is proven.

Zamboanga problem. In the face of the fighting in Zamboanga City, some people have wondered why the President did not declare a state of emergency. The simple answer is that we are no longer under martial law or the 1973 Constitution, which provided for this extraordinary power of the president: “Whenever in the judgment of the President (Prime Minister), there exists a grave emergency or a threat or imminence thereof, or whenever the interim Batasang Pambansa or the regular National Assembly fails or is unable to act adequately on any matter for any reason that in his judgment requires immediate action, he may, in order to meet the exigency, issue the necessary decrees, orders or letters of instruction, which shall form part of the law of the land.”

Now it is Congress that has the power to declare a state of emergency: “In times of war or other national emergency, the Congress may by law authorize the President, for a limited period and subject to such restrictions as it may prescribe, to promulgate rules and regulations to carry out a declared national policy.” Congress has not declared a state of emergency.

It is not, however, as if the President were powerless to deal with emergencies. As Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, the President, in case of rebellion, when public safety requires it, can declare martial law or call on the Armed Forces to suppress lawless violence or rebellion. President Aquino had greater reason than President Arroyo had when she declared martial law in Maguindanao. There clearly was rebellion in Zamboanga City. Martial law could have given him all the emergency powers he might need. But instead he simply exercised his power to call out the Armed Forces to help the police suppress rebellion in Zamboanga; and it seems to be working, even if he did not have to stay in the city!

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Fulpol

    President Aquino had greater reason than President Arroyo had when she declared martial law in Maguindanao

    —————-

    those involved in the massacre were Ampatuans.. mayor, the governor and the ARMM head.. how many ampatuans relatives ruling the province? majority…

    the ampatuan clans are accused of the massacre..

    who will govern the province?? no other than military rule… so martial law was declared..

    • disqus_vU1klyrdjb

      Because the Ampatuans rely on pork barrel to fund their lifestlye and family dynasty. Pork is given to basically every politician, across the country.

  • UrHONOR

    “that the House is the judge of what constitutes disorderly behavior…

    HONOR among the “honorables” wiil always be upheld by the “honorables”.

  • John Deep

    “….On the question of whether a legislator under investigation should voluntarily go on leave, that is for the individual legislator to decide.”

    So why am i not surprised that nobody’s doing it? On the contrary, chutzpah-rich Sen. Jinggoy Estrada, is even singing ‘I’m Sexy and I Know it’ with a swagger reminiscent of the pre-wheelchair Renato Corona… :)

  • shioktong

    294 seats in the house of Representatives +24 senators is a joke to us all.
    Addition to that, the ineffective & inefficient snail-moving justice system is a hindrance to peace & progress.
    Clearly, the legislative body and the judicial body are the cancer to this country.
    Destruction of them all is a peace to us all.

    • captainramius

      Kabayan
      You are absolutely and 100 % freaking correct !!
      We spend billions of our money to support these 2 houses of congress and they failed to address the most pressing problem of this country which is continuing Poverty and inequality of wealth distribution.
      and worse they become corrupt themselves and use our own money to perpetuate themselves and their families forever in political positions.
      Legislative branch is a useless and overrated branch of our govt .
      The people will be better off without them.

      • disqus_vU1klyrdjb

        You’re both right. Nothing will change until the people make it change. There is no way those in power are going to fall on their sword for the better of the country. They are in power for the money, and to keep their family dynasties in power to fund their lifestyle at the expense of the taxpayer, as usual.

        Sometimes the only solution is a revolution. The people’s power was a fancy shift of power from one family dynasty to another. Not much has changed for the better, only progressively worse.

      • AlzheimersC

        You failed to run for office tapos iiyak ka ngayon? O baka wala ka talagang makumbinsi in personal? hahaha

    • AlzheimersC

      Wow! kahit brgy captain hindi man lang nanalo ang ugok na ito kaya BITTER sa mga nakaupong public officials ngayon… :) Bakit personally KILALA mo ba ang 294 & 24 representatives respectively? baka kapitbahay mo hindi mo pa kilala eh? hohoho!

  • The_Squiller

    The almost unanimous trashing and bashing of these provisions itemizing the nature and process of dispensation of the pork barrel in our Constitution clearly shows how through the years our lawmakers and executive leaders have deviously fine-tuned and blacksmithed the legality of stealing.

    Add to that, the theory of “separation of powers” guaranteed that no other branch of government may meddle nor intervene in their collective scheme of skimming the country’s taxes with impunity. How even a mere theory is propped up as a chasm between them and investigating authorities and the electorate to hinder exposition of their thieving conspiracy only shows the height of their callousness.

    Such is the scurrilous nature of our Constitution being a mirror of the minds of our political leaders that 99 percent of the comments here did not touch on the topic of Zamboanga.

    • disqus_vU1klyrdjb

      It’s rather sad how this administration is trying to keep the Zamboanga issue perpetual on the media. You’re right, the people in general care more about the pork issue than Zamboanga – because it affects every taxpayer for at least a decade.

  • lcl_omn11

    ang damidami palang pera ng gobyerno-the pdafs, pork barrel ng pres, the malampaya funds, discfreionary funds ng mga cabinet members, governors, mayors even barangays and sk..na napupunta lang sa mga bulsa ng walang kapararakan…sana wal nang mahirap, walang problema sa baha, walang squatters..etc…sana hayahay ang pinoys..

    • disqus_vU1klyrdjb

      And the councilors. QC councilors get ~45,000,000+ per year pork, (I heard 60m+ nowadays), and extra money to hire exployees for them. They make ghost employees and pocket the money for themselves, of course.

      Then they teach this behavior where media outlets would call them “businesswoman/businessmen” to their children and relatives so they can get them a position in politics to steal money and teach their kin so on and so forth…

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

editors' picks

November 28, 2014

Revolutionary colorum

advertisement
November 27, 2014

Stick to boxing

advertisement