At Large

Casting a wider net


Lingayen-Dagupan Archbishop Socrates Villegas, the incoming president of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines, has issued a pastoral letter on the currently “hot” issue of the misuse of the Priority Development Assistance Fund by certain legislators.

The PDAF, for those who only tuned in now, consists of money provided for congresspersons and senators to “identify” priority projects from a menu provided by specific departments. The thinking behind the practice, I assume, is that legislators, by virtue of their being politicians and representatives of the folks in their districts and constituencies, know the latter’s particular needs and are in a position to recommend the needed projects. Also, the PDAF allows legislators to respond to requests for help from the public, allowing them to repay political debts and dispense favors.

But not for nothing is the PDAF better known by another nickname: pork barrel. For too many legislators, over the years, have treated the money as their own trough from which to feed—enriching themselves and securing the funding for their next campaign.

Over the years, mechanisms have been devised to limit the damage that pork-hungry legislators could wreak. Supposedly, they do not even have the power to handle the money themselves, their participation limited to identifying their priority projects and requesting the departments concerned—with their mediation—to provide the necessary funds. But as the saying goes: kung may gusot, may lusot—literally, where there’s a wrinkle, there’s a way out. These ways out have ranged from having a list of “pet” contractors who agree to arrangements for funneling commissions to the legislators, to contracting an agent (for instance, JLN Group of Companies whose “pork barrel” facilitation is now being looked into by the National Bureau of Investigation) who packages proposed projects, including the use of fictitious NGOs as beneficiaries.

Despite efforts to curb abuse of the PDAF system, scandals continue to haunt the entire stinking pork mess. Though agencies like the Commission on Audit are tasked to oversee the proper use of the funds, the truth is that legislators have a way of flexing muscle, with the connivance of the oversight agencies and even the local governments hosting the projects. The executive branch, after all, still needs legislative support for priority legislation. No wonder P-Noy in his last State of the Nation Address made no mention of the latest pork barrel scandal and still included allocations for the PDAF in the budget Malacañang submitted to Congress.

* * *

Now back to Archbishop Soc. While he made the usual calls for reform, including the need for Congress to junk pork and concentrate instead on passing laws, his statement is made more remarkable by widening the “circle of blame” beyond that of the legislators and their cohorts.

For one, he said that before the public “rush[es] to pass judgment on our legislators who avail [themselves] of the pork barrel, it would be opportune for us citizens to search our souls and ask ‘What have I done to contribute to this?’”

“In reality,” said the archbishop, “we ordinary citizens partake of the bounty of the ‘discretionary funds’ by asking our government officials to help our personal needs, family concerns, barangay projects or even Church fiestas.” He suggests—and good luck to him—that we “make it our rule of life” when dealing with politicians not to ask for money from them: “Walang hihingi!” was his suggested slogan. “Every time we ask our politicians for monetary help, we tempt them to dig into the pork barrel coffers or jueteng chests to accommodate our request,” he said.

“Walang hihingi!” was likewise Archbishop Soc’s suggested “mantra” for Church-based organizations and institutions, noting that the Church or its officials “contribute to the corruption by grabbing a piece of the pie through our solicitations from government officials—from candles to basketball uniforms to bags of cement to government bulldozers. We tempt public officials to get money from jueteng or the pork barrel in order to accommodate us. Walang hihingi!”

* * *

This is astonishing, indeed, as Archbishop Soc has chosen not just to narrowly focus on the failings of politicians—even if these failings are, indeed, glaring and scandalous—but also to cast a wider net to include ordinary citizens as well as Church officials whose own fiscal conduct has not been exactly open and aboveboard.

“We who are stewards of the material goods of the Church must be transparent in our fundraising projects,” he said. “We must prepare our accounting reports of how Church funds are disbursed insuring all the time that the principle of accountability is observed. When we are less than transparent in our accounting, we hurt the truth. Ang sinungaling ay kapatid ng magnanakaw (The liar is a sibling of the thief).”

* * *

Fueling the public outrage over the pork barrel scandal are photos posted on social media outlets showing a daughter of Janet Lim Napoles, who founded JLN and is widely believed to be the “architect” of the alleged P10-billion scam, in designer dresses and shoes and posing with her brand-new Porsche.

In her defense, Napoles admitted to a TV interviewer that the photos were authentic but that the luxury goods her daughter flaunts were bought “with our own money, through our own businesses. Not a peso of government money was used.”

Lower those eyebrows. The Bureau of Internal Revenue, through Commissioner Kim Henares, has said it has put the Napoles family under its scrutiny, but their protestations of earning an honest buck are belied by their daughter’s braggadocio.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • parengtony

    Simple Pork Barrel arithmetic:
    200 Million pesos x 6-year term = 1.2 Billion per senator per term.
    If reelected to a second term, Total Pork barrel per senator = 2.4 Billion!

    200 Million pesos x 24 senators = 4.8 Billion annual Senate Pork Barrel!

    Lower House Pork Barrel –
    288 congressmen x 70 million = 20.16 Billion??????!!!!!!!!!! annual Lower House Pork Barrel.

  • tadasolo

    The concept of the PDAF is good if accompanied with transparency and eliminate or in the context of our cultural affliction minimized corruptive influence. We need to police ourselves better I think we need to retain these development funds to each district provided funding should be targeted and allocated based on documented evidence and benckmarks. It is one way we could help poor communities. We need to ensure funds will be withheld on each districts if no documentation and funding program is in place.

  • bgcorg

    “Kung walang korap, walang mahirap,” also challenges us to eliminate sources of corruption and to look within ourselves, as the good archbishop invites us to do, where we contribute or fail to grapple with ourselves objectively. In this world, we are pilgrims, politicians and constituents all, obligated to help one another (“who is my neighbor?”) as we journey until we reach our heavenly home, to which all are destined to be. In this passing world, all are bound, in other words, to contribute towards social justice, love and peace among all. Moral life is much a part of politics, as eating provides nourishment for our bodies. Moral leadership should continue to fire public life, and giving up “pork,” Mr. President, could be a good start (starting with you) to fight poverty effectively! “Kung walang korap, walang mahirap.” Ditto.

  • virgoyap

    In her defense, Napoles admitted to a TV interviewer that the photos
    were authentic but that the luxury goods her daughter flaunts were
    bought “with our own money, through our own businesses. Not a peso of
    government money was used.” Hahahaha!!! “Ang sinungaling ay kapatid ng magnanakaw!!!!”

  • Islaslolo

    I can understand the excitement of Archbishop Villegas now that he will be the president of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines. But before he start moralizing on our government officials and interfering in the affairs of the State, he should clean up his house and backyard first. He cannot pretend that sexual abuse of children and corruption in the Roman Catholic hierarchy do not exist.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks

June 02, 2015

Political patronage

June 01, 2015

Ready to rumble