With Due Respect

Church of the poor


The election of Archbishop Socrates B. Villegas to the presidency of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines complements the renewal of the Catholic Church in our country that began with the elevation of Archbishop Luis Antonio G. Tagle to the College of Cardinals. Both are young, humble, prayerful and empowering.

Back to origins. In a larger sense, these two shepherds echo the simplicity and theology of reformist Pope Francis in the universal Church. Like him, they are great communicators in the new media—straightforward, uncomplicated and direct from the heart. They unravel the great mysteries of Christianity and the ponderous papal encyclicals via their plain, everyday language and their simple, austere lifestyle.

Newly elevated they may all have been and newly minted their messages may appear to be, in my humble view they really bring back the Church to its roots, to the original rock the Lord Jesus Christ founded and anchored it—a Church of the poor, by the poor and for the poor.

But what is the Church of the poor? Let me quote the answer of the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines (PCP II) convened on Jan. 20-Feb. 17, 1991, to implement in our country the reforms proclaimed in 1962-65 by the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II):

“A Church that embraces and practices the evangelical spirit of poverty which combines detachment from possessions with a profound trust in the Lord as the only source of salvation… A Church [that] will courageously defend and vindicate the rights of the poor and the oppressed even when doing so will mean alienation or persecution from the rich and powerful… A Church where nobody is so poor as to have nothing to give, and nobody so rich as to have nothing to receive.”

Indeed, the new leaders are steering the Church back to Jesus Christ who identified Himself with the poor—“Truly, I say to you: whenever you did this to one of the least, of these my brothers, you did it to me… Truly, I say to you: whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me” (Mt. 25:40,45).

Unusual leader. By reaching out to the poor and liberating them from their misery, our new shepherds echo Jesus Christ’s mission: “The spirit of the Lord is upon me. He has anointed me to bring good news to the poor, to proclaim liberty to captives and new sight to the blind; to free the oppressed and announce the Lord’s year of mercy” (Lk 4:18).

When Pope Francis forsook his gilded seat, I was reminded that Jesus’ throne was a wooden cross, His crown was a bouquet of thorns, His scepter a lowly reed, and His ring a rusty nail driven through His palm. Nonetheless, Jesus made it absolutely clear who He was, what His objectives were, and how He intended to accomplish them.

Jesus explained in different ways to different people. To His disciples, He taught loftily, authoritatively. In His sermon on the mount, He leaned in favor of the poor, the sorrowing, the simple-hearted and the peacemakers. He condemned the hypocrite, the arrogant, the proud and the self-righteous. He forgave the repentant and the simple-hearted.

To the nondisciples, Jesus spoke in parables, which were intended “to enable the listener to discover something for himself.” They awakened faith and made the nonbeliever discover the truth without being lectured on.

This is why most of his parables ended with questions: “Which of these three, do you think, made himself neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of the robbers?” was the question He asked in the parable of the good Samaritan (Lk 10:36); or “Now, what will the owner of the vineyard do to them?” in the parable of the tenants (Lk 20:16).

Courage and conviction. Jesus was a leader of enormous courage and unbreakable conviction. When He walked the earth 2,000 years ago, there was no freedom of speech, no freedom to dissent, no freedom to oppose. Group conformity was the standard of truth and virtue.

But Jesus was “a man who had the courage of his convictions. No tradition was too sacred to be questioned. No authority was too great to be contradicted… No assumption was too fundamental to be changed,” wrote Albert Nolan in his book, “Jesus Before Christianity.”

Jesus was a servant-leader who led by example, teaching His disciples, “As you know, the so-called rulers of the nation act as tyrants and their great ones oppress them. But it shall not be so among you; whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you shall make himself slave of all. Think of the Son of Man who has not come to be served but to serve and to give his life to redeem many” (Mk 10:42-45).

To show that He was ready to perform the humblest of service, He washed the feet of His apostles, telling them, “You call me Master and Lord, and you are right for so I am. If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet, you also must wash one another’s feet” (Jn 13:13-14).

Jesus was a leader of intense prayer and unbending faith. The Bible is replete with stories of Jesus praying. In the Garden of Gethsemane, He prayed so intensely that “great drops of blood formed like sweat and fell to the ground” (Lk 22:44).

In sum, the renewal of the Church is an ever continuing process and does not necessarily denigrate the old order. In the same manner, parents are not diminished when their children surpass them.

Congratulations to His Excellency, His Eminence and His Holiness for renewing the Church and bringing it back to Jesus Christ.

* * *

Comments to

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • mad_as_Hamlet

    * * * * * * * * *
    Who, though he was in the form of God,
    Did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped,
    But emptied himself, taking the form of a servant,
    Being born in the likeness of men.
    And being found in human form he humbled himself
    And became obedient unto death, [even death on a cross].
    Therefore God has highly exalted him
    And bestowed on him the name which is above every name,
    That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
    In heaven and on earth, and under the earth,
    And every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord,
    To the glory of God the Father.
    – – –
    (Philippians 2:6-11, RSV)

  • Eustaquio Joven

    A must read… for priests and bishops.

  • bgcorg

    Those who think that the Church wanted the poor to remain poor just so that collections may be more, are out of their minds. If this is correct, as they erroneously and with prejudice believe, it would be more logical to cater to the rich! In that way, the Church would receive more; quite the opposite, the Church of Christ is the community of the poor in spirit. It is so clear how crooked some people think to justify their thesis. An example, in addition, is this: they interpret “conception” as implantation in the edometrium wall of the woman’s uterus, and force that meaning on to justify that “conception” in the Constitution means the beginning of pregnancy, i.e., when the zygote implants itself in the endometrium! Give or take a few days, therefore, the Constitution does not protect life, which is absurd. The intention of the Constitution is clear and does not admit of another interpretation. It guarantees the protection of life (among the basic freedoms of man: the right to life, freedom from want, freedom of speech and the right to religion. It says, “from the moment of conception,” not from the moment of pregnancy or implantation. If one wishes, conception is protected from ovulation, fertilization and implantation, not just in pregnancy which is clearly different from “conception.” To interpret “conception ” as implantation is against the Constitution.

    • magsasakasanayon

      go home and molest some kids, you idiot. :D

    • Crazy_horse101010

      are we going to hear this again and its the fanatics that are out of their minds the church preys on the poor even your bishops say to much education is a bad thing it is for the church are you a doctor or scientist to know. even they cant agree. anyway your brainwashing tripe has been heard a hundred times over and over again

  • hustlergalore

    naku ha.

    mismo ang catholic church sa pinas nung panahon ng kastilaloy ang pumipigil para sa mga indio na mag-aral.


  • Paliwaweng

    …it is perplexing to know that an ex-chief justice believe on priests, bishops and their church dogma/s.
    Anyone who believe on a book declaring the earth as cylindrical flat, and more or less than seven thousand years, and who says that gays and lesbians are abominations and needs to be killed, and that the sun revolves around the earth can be said as unthinking.

  • Vic_Usi

    Why don’t you ask the people you call poor if they know Archbishops Villegas and Tagle? Please don’t be surprised. They don’t.

    Maybe you are correct in saying that the church now is the Church of the Poor. Yes, they are right there in front of some churches begging with their run-down clothes on while the priests live in the comfort of air-conditioned rooms.

  • virgoyap

    Why did I miss this very nice piece by Ex-Justice Artemio Panganiban? Yes, this is really the kind of Church that I longed for. A Church that is focused on the essential message of the Gospel instead of being a reactionary Church who is very much entangled with its obsolete and out-of-this- world doctrine.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks

May 23, 2015

Tough guy

May 22, 2015

China versus Edca