No Free Lunch

Pillars of inclusive growth


IN 2007, an Asian Development Bank (ADB) study identified four critical constraints that had kept the Philippine economy from growing as fast as those of most of its Asian neighbors: (1) tight government finances, (2) inadequate infrastructure (particularly in electricity and transport), (3) weak investor confidence due to governance concerns (particularly on corruption and political instability), and (4) market failures leading to a small and narrow industrial base. While our neighbors’ economies had seen decades of dynamic growth, our own economy had consistently trailed behind. As such, between 1960 and 2006, the average income (GDP per capita) in the Philippines barely doubled, while that in Singapore grew more than 12 times, in Thailand nearly eight times, in Malaysia nearly six times, and in Indonesia more than five times.

Times have since changed, and our economy’s growth now outpaces the rest of Asia as of the first quarter of this year. Our improved growth performance may trace to our having substantially (though still not sufficiently) addressed the first and third constraints. Government revenues have been growing by double digits, coupled with substantial savings from plugged leakages in traditionally corruption-prone agencies. At the same time, domestic investment has been growing at rates not seen in more than a decade. Still, as is everyone’s lament, such faster growth remains enjoyed by a relative few, particularly because the second and fourth constraints have yet to be overcome—and these will take more time.

Addressing infrastructure as a constraint to inclusive growth will take more than improved government finances and public-private partnership (PPP) schemes. For as long as the operation of public facilities is barred from foreign majority participation, there will be a narrow field of PPP participants, and it will be confined to the same familiar small group of large domestic players—the same players already dominating our economy and reaping the lion’s share of its benefits. We also need to be more deliberate about providing what I’d call “inclusive infrastructure”—that is, those that provide wider benefits for those among us who have less. I refer to mass housing, rural electrification, irrigation, water supply and sanitation, schools and hospitals, and farm to market roads. Despite years of large budgets and lip service, the last has persistently remained lacking because corrupt officials either hijacked budgets for them, or built them in the wrong places based on political considerations rather than priority needs.

The fourth constraint cited by ADB boils down to an oligarchic economy, with “market failures” referring to those caused by the exercise of monopoly and oligopoly power. It is manifested in what I have for many years described as narrow, shallow and hollow growth. We need to pursue wider geographic and sectoral dispersal of economic activities, and open key economic sectors to wider competition to avoid dominance by a few. We need growth to come more from industries with strong forward and backward linkages in the domestic economy, so that the benefits of growth would permeate widely and not be confined to enclaves. And we need more growth coming from industries that provide large numbers of steady and decent jobs.

Based on these, there are four pillars we need to build inclusive growth on. First is a strong competition policy that eliminates barriers to entry, prohibits unfair trade practices, and ensures a level playing field for large and small enterprises alike. This long-pending legislation must be a top priority, as it could well be the most far-reaching economic legislation the 16th Congress could enact. Second is a concerted government-wide push for small and medium enterprise development, starting with wider and easier access to SME finance. Third is improved implementation of asset reform, which takes four forms in the Philippines: the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program for small farmers, the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act for indigenous communities, the Fisheries Code for municipal fishers, and the Urban Development and Housing Act for the urban poor. All seek to promote more equitable access to economic assets, hence opportunities for advancement.

The fourth pillar entails boosting the most promising drivers of inclusive growth in the economy: agriculture, tourism, manufacturing and construction. Much has already been said and written on the first three. The last has been a prominent driver of employment growth since 2010. Even more construction jobs could come about in the years ahead if we embark on (1) an aggressive public mass-housing program built on more realistic and accessible financing mechanisms, which recognizes adequate mass housing as a public good, hence deserving subsidy; (2) intensified investments in irrigation and drainage, especially with continuing lack of the former and the traditional tendency to neglect the latter (a key reason roads don’t last as long as they should, and require constant repair at great cost), and (3) an aggressive urban renewal program especially in decaying cities like Manila, that could employ incentives such as real property tax waivers/discounts to encourage private owners to restore, rehabilitate or rebuild dilapidated structures with historical/cultural significance (the way Vigan managed to restore its century-old houses, for example).

There is truly much yet to be done in the remaining half of this administration, if it is to leave a sustainable legacy of an economy that uplifts the lives of all Filipinos.


Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Weder-Weder Lang

    Midway in his presidency, PNoy has done nothing on the so-called 4 pillars of growth. The only thing he has to show for is massive election spending stimulus which kicked in late last year to the first half of this year. Like all artificial stimulus, this one is already losing steam. Even the hot money has left our shores because of the corruption in PNoy’s administration. It won’t be long before PNoy starts looking for another scapegoat for his failure to achieve targets. Last we heard, NIA Administrator Nangel was fired because PNoy won’t be able to make his promise of rice self-sufficiency come true.

    Balisacan might just be next for setting the goalpost too far.

  • TinimbangNgunitKulang

    What is the major difference between the lacklusterPhilippines and those other progressing Asian countries? Religion. Need we say more?

    • TV

      And dont forget corruption, too.

  • TV

    Plugged leakages from corruption?! A quick check of the headlines reveals the contrary! I would say corruption is the number one reason why this country’s economic performance is sub-optimal.

  • buninay1

    Though I am tempted to repeat and drumbeat about Habito’s prescription to power up our economy, I still think that everything boils down to the backdoor and upfront actors ability to pull these things together. We should not forget that the economic team of Pnoy administration has tremendous responsibility to do things right this time. Their every action and every decision bears watching. We should not just be in the sideline clapping and booing them down according as how their actions go but we should also do our obligation to make the whole vision a reality . We can contribute for example by making our respective business decision a success and paying the right taxes on time regardless of the runaway corruption upstairs. Anyway, if and when this overall vision is realized, everybody will benefit.

  • 80baudot95

    agree mr. habito. all of the above have been pretty obvious to many for decades now. but unfortunately he who has the gold makes the rule. bad politics in collusion with bad oligarchs is like swimming against a stronger current. key is a political will and a reformed politics, both of which are simply being washed away by the strong current of greediness and indifference by our country’s weak and bad leaders, both government, private sectors, and ultimately by citizens’ apathy.


    Obviously the kid president is not interested in all the economics facts and economic realities. He’s interested of the “WHISTLE BLOWERS” hullabaloo and other yellow oligarchic privitizations on gov’t concessions and public utilities…a legacy from Cory…

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks

May 23, 2015

Tough guy

May 22, 2015

China versus Edca