Quantcast

Editorial

Hellish

If only the Philippine capital had worthier chroniclers of even its eyesores and miseries. Instead of a Charles Dickens immortalizing the brutalities of Victorian London, we have to make do with the bestselling author Dan Brown and his ephemeral novels. For better or for worse, the description of Manila as the figurative “gates of hell,” by a character in his latest potboiler, seems to have stuck, like a viral meme or, worse, an urban legend. But at least one part of that description—the “six-hour traffic jams”—seems to have been on many minds over the weekend, and also about three weeks earlier, when traffic in certain parts of the National Capital Region all but ground to a halt.

The primary cause of the June 17 traffic gridlock was natural: heavy rains. That of July 6 was quite definitely man-made: the government decision to proceed with “reblocking” of key portions of Epifanio de los Santos Avenue, Metro Manila’s main thoroughfare. The result in either case was extremely heavy traffic—as well as public anger, a lot of it.

In the earlier case, the capital region’s public transportation services and infrastructure seemed to have been overwhelmed at the exact time people needed them the most. Public Works Secretary Rogelio Singson later admitted, in a rare act of official candor, that work on unclogging crucial esteros had not pushed through according to schedule (that is to say, before the start of the rainy season) because local politicians had requested a postponement until after May’s midterm elections.

In the latter case, the Department of Public Works and Highways pushed through with its plan to reblock five portions of Edsa in three cities plus another one in Commonwealth Avenue, in Quezon City, beginning on Friday night. Unfortunately, there wasn’t enough notice given or enough alternative routes prepared. The result: Motorists and commuters woke up to heavy rainy-day traffic, on a dry Saturday.

It did not help that, just last Friday, Socio-Economic Planning Secretary Arsenio Balisacan had quantified the cost of the heavy traffic plague, giving the public a handy number to remember. According to a study prepared by the Japan International Cooperation Agency, the country loses about P2.4 billion a day from traffic-related delays. (The gates of hell now have a price tag.)

This seems like a preposterously large sum, over $20 billion a year or about a tenth of the value of the entire economy. We have not had a chance to read the Jica study for ourselves; but going by a much earlier paper, prepared by the same Japanese agency in 1999, which estimates that “direct losses” (wasted gasoline, wasted electricity and so on) account for about 28 percent of the total amount, we can assume that today some P245 billion in traffic-related losses may be classified as direct. That works out to less than P700 million a day—still a shocking, substantial sum.

Because of the still-skewed nature of the Philippine economy, the National Capital Region accounts for a little over a third of the gross domestic product; if we include the Calabarzon and Central Luzon provinces, parts of which adjoin Metro Manila, into the mix, over 60 percent of GDP is produced in a cluster that is vulnerable to the vicissitudes of Metro Manila’s traffic.

The long-term solution must lie in a massive effort to decongest Metro Manila—to move more of its offices and plants and factories to other areas. That is a solution that is beyond the capacities of even the most popular of governments; it will take a lot of political will, and even more patience on the part of the public, before the tipping point is reached.

One example: The argument against developing the Clark airport as the country’s main air hub depends on the assumption that many travelers want to reach Metro Manila; in this view, therefore, Clark’s distance becomes a problem. But if the framework for understanding the development of Clark is decongesting Metro Manila, and encouraging the relocation of Metro Manila-based industries, then Clark’s distance becomes an opportunity.

Short-term, the solutions are just as difficult: Encouraging greater use of public transportation systems, upgrading and expanding the capacity of those systems to accommodate more passengers, not least, enforcing traffic discipline (many studies point to free-for-all parking and loading-unloading practices as a major cause of traffic).

It’s a long slog.


Follow Us





More from this Column:




Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=56123

  • WeAry_Bat

    Actually, it started in the early afternoon of Friday July 5 as we were speeding on the other way to a meeting. From Ortigas, the horror show was stretching all the way to SLEX.

    Going back, we didn’t take the SLEX which is how it was only an hour’s travel back. Waze was showing the traffic was emanating from Quezon City. I thought it was the weather.

    The real cause was worse than weather.

    • hennagaijin

      Ortigas Ave. is a parking lot on the best of days.

  • Roy Villarama

    Relocating businesses outside Manila would be ideal . . . if the infrastructure elsewhere wasn’t so crappy. You have your massive brownouts in Mindanao, for instance. Too much attention had already been lavished in developing Manila, and now it’s working against us. Your mention of the Clark Airport shows how the mindset is still Manila-centric. Start fixing the other regions and not only will businesses in Manila relocate, but foreign direct investments will pout in as well.

  • wency

    Paanong luluwag ang traffc sa dami ng sasakyang dumadagdag taon-taon? Baka 5% ang dami ng dagdag na sasakyan sa kalsada, samantalang hindi naman nadadagdagan ang kalsada. Kaya waang solusyon dyan hanggang ang ating pag-unlad ay binibilang sa dami ng sasakyang nabenta.

  • Juanito Cruz

    The government should push through with the plan to develop Clark as the country’s main hub, construct a skyway from Cloverleaf, Balintawak to Makati, and develop NAIA into another CDB. This way, first-time tourists will experience smooth traffic from Clark thru NLEX and skyway to Makati. At present, first-time tourists would hesitate coming back to Manila after experiencing heavy traffic right after exiting the airport terminal.

    • mekeni62

      ayaw ni Pnoy. He hates Pampanga you know.

  • juan magtanggol

    THERE ARE LOTS OF CARS ON THE ROAD AND MORE ARE COMING BUT THE ROADS ARE THE SAME…SO WE NEED MORE ROADS BY BUILDING OVERPASSES….LRT OR MRT DIDN;T SOLVE THE TRAFFIC BECAUSE WE NEED ROADS…DECONGEST MANILA BY BUILDING LTR OR MRT GOING TO THE NEIGHBORING PROVINCES LIKE BULACAN, CAVITE LAGUNA RIZAL SO PEOPLE CAN LIVE IN THOSE AREAS AND CAN STILL WORK IN METRO MANILA COMMUTING VIA LRT-MRT….LOOK AT INDIA…TRAINS FROM OUT SIDE THE CITY ARE ALWAYS FULL UP TO THE TOP GOING IN AND OUT OF THE CITY CARRYING WORKERS …..ANOTHER GOOD EXAMPLE IS SINGAPORE…



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace