Married in eyes of God even if not in eyes of Church

I was greatly disturbed when I read in the June 19 issue of the Inquirer a statement of Archbishop Oscar Cruz, head of the National Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal of the Catholic Church, on marriage between a lesbian and a gay man. This prelate rules out any chance of same-sex unions but says a lesbian and a gay man should be allowed to marry. Can they get married? Having asked himself this question, the archbishop says he has come to the conclusion “that they have the capacity to consummate the union. The anatomy is there.” Here speaks a doctor of law (please see Tim. 1: 7-8) and an anatomist.

I like to give my own opinion, which is by no means a dogma. In the first place I want to state here that it is not he or any other bishop or priest who gives the sacrament of matrimony to a couple; it is the couple themselves who give the sacrament to each other and then, if they are sincere, they are married in the eyes of God, even if they are not married in the eyes of the Church. They can express their marriage vows in front of a priest/pastor or a judge so that their children will be legitimate. A same-sex union can also get the Church’s blessing but that would not be marriage. A same-sex couple have the right to live together as a couple and they should enjoy the same benefits as those who are married or live in a civil union.

This is an opinion of someone who has been a priest before but decided to leave the priesthood and got married to a woman who had lost her husband in a political incident. We decided to get married because we loved each other, and I felt compassion for her children. I did not ask for dispensation from Rome but I asked permission from my superior general in Rome. We did not get married in the Church either, but we married before a judge and I sincerely believe that we were married in the eyes of God and I am thankful that I got that beautiful experience of being married; and therefore I can speak from experience, something Archbishop Cruz cannot do, unfortunately. We also had our own daughter and for me it was a sign that God had approved of our decision to get married.

In this respect I also believe that it is high time for the Church, and the State as well, to review its legislation on divorce and separation. A couple should be allowed to get a divorce for reasons of incompatibility or other impediments, and they should be allowed to marry again, especially for the sake of their children. To divorce or separate, they don’t have to go to Rome but they should get that from a judge and a therapist who are competent to declare their previous marriage null and void. That would greatly minimize their expenses and, more importantly, it would give their children a new father or mother.


O.Carm. associate,

Cagayan de Oro City, nolvanvugt@gmail.com

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=55651

Tags: Catholic Church , Gay Marriage , Gender issues , Religion

Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


  • Ukraine FM: We are ready to fight Russia
  • Slain officer’s ‘diagram’ rocks PNP
  • 2 contractors fined P25,000 for delays in Edsa rehab
  • Luisita beneficiaries take over renters
  • 5 years of hard work pay off for top UP grad
  • Sports

  • Sharapova advances to Stuttgart quarterfinals
  • Galedo caps ride of redemption
  • Beermen, Express dispute second semis slot today
  • Lady Agilas upset Lady Bulldogs in four sets
  • NLEX roars to 7th D-League win
  • Lifestyle

  • Wear a rainbow on your wrist
  • Wearing Kate Moss
  • Sail into summer
  • Life lessons from the Ultimate Warrior
  • Young actor profile: Teejay Marquez
  • Entertainment

  • Kristoffer Martin: from thug to gay teen
  • Has Ai Ai fallen deeply with ‘sireno?’
  • California court won’t review Jackson doctor case
  • Cris Villonco on play adapted from different medium
  • OMB exec’s assurance: We work 24/7
  • Business

  • Gaming stocks gain, PSEi eases on profit-taking
  • Cebu Pacific flew 3.74M passengers as of March
  • Corporate bonds sweeteners
  • Professionals in the family business
  • Foreign funds flowed out in Q1, says BSP
  • Technology

  • Vatican announces hashtag for April 27 canonizations
  • Enrile in Masters of the Universe, Lord of the Rings?
  • Top Traits of Digital Marketers
  • No truth to viral no-visa ‘chronicles’
  • ‘Unlimited’ Internet promos not really limitless; lawmakers call for probe
  • Opinion

  • Editorial Cartoon, April 25, 2014
  • No deal, Janet
  • Like making Al Capone a witness vs his gang
  • MERS-CoV and mothers
  • A graduation story
  • Global Nation

  • Afghan hospital guard kills 3 American doctors
  • Career diplomat is new PH consul general in Los Angeles
  • US4GG: Aquino should ask Obama for TPS approval, drone technology
  • Complex health care system for California’s elderly and poor explained
  • Tiff with HK over Luneta hostage fiasco finally over
  • Marketplace