There’s the Rub

Nations and people


The Philippines and Taiwan have agreed to avoid armed confrontations in dealing with fishing disputes. Henceforth, we will share maritime law enforcement, notifying each other posthaste whenever actions are taken against vessels and crews of one or the other.

It’s welcome news. It douses the threat of a conflagration, which is escalating enmity between the two camps.

The friction, of course, stemmed from the killing of a 65-year-old Taiwanese fisherman by the Philippine Coast Guard some months ago. Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou called it a “cold-blooded murder” while the PCG called it self-defense, saying the Taiwanese boat tried to ram them after they blocked its path. The PCG claimed the vessel was in Philippine waters; Taiwan claimed it was in open sea.

Philippine authorities, along with a group of Taiwanese investigators, soon discovered that the Taiwanese fishing boat bore no signs of having tried to ram anything. It bore instead some 50 bullet holes from an assault weapon, suggesting overkill. The Department of Justice ruled to file charges against the erring PCG members.

For a while, the soured relations between the Philippines and Taiwan threatened dire consequences. Ma called for a freeze in new Filipino hires and the cessation of visits by Taiwanese tourists to these shores. Several thousand booked flights to the Philippines for the summer were cancelled. He also ordered the conduct of naval drills near Philippine waters.

Doubtless, Leila de Lima’s decision had something to do with appeasing the Taiwanese. But quite apart from that, it is also, which is what her department is supposed to ensure, a matter of justice. National pride may not supersede it. Other considerations may not supersede it. The killing of a fisherman, Taiwanese or Filipino, is lamentable. The taking of a life, intentionally or out of recklessness, is unacceptable. If we are at fault, we should own it. If we are wrong, we should rectify it.

The government has. The strength of the P-Noy administration has always lain in its insistence on pursuing the high moral ground. It continues to do so in this case, which is praiseworthy.

It also happens to have far-reaching consequences.

At the very least, it forestalls an escalation of economic retaliation from both sides. Which is more disastrous for us than for Taiwan. Taiwan is a premier destination for OFWs, being underpopulated as a result of a similar policy as China of limiting population growth and needing overseas workers to do a variety of jobs. We’ve had good relations with it in the past, notwithstanding our one-China policy, which demotes it to a province of China. Why lose all that because of a misunderstanding? We need Taiwan more than it needs us.

While at this, it should also draw attention to our relations with China itself. Nobody can avoid dealing economically with China today. Not the Asian countries, not the United States, not the world. Not even the Asian countries currently locked in a territorial dispute with it. It’s the second biggest economic power in the world, and looks poised to take the crown from even America over the next decade or so. Its economic impact on us is incalculable, being a source of cheap manufactures. God made the world, as the quite serious joke goes, everything else was made in China. It’s no less true for us than it is for other countries.

Other countries, and far richer ones, have learned the trick of not taking territorial disputes, however ferocious, personally, but have continued to deal economically with the other party. Other countries, and far stronger ones, have learned the art of separating grain from chaff, continuing to exchange goods along with barbs with perceived aggressors. If the pragmatism is necessary for a country’s benefit, it is certainly so for a country’s survival. We would do well to learn from those other countries.

At the very most, it helps prevent a nasty instinct, or reflex, or bias from rearing its ugly head again. China-bashing threatens to unleash it. That anti-Chinese sentiment is latent in our culture, along with an anti-Moro one. Lest we forget, we carried out pogroms or massacres of the Chinese during Spanish times. To this day, sitcoms are littered with people trying to be funny by speaking with a Chinese accent. Indeed, to this day, many Filipinos regard the Chinese distrustfully, believing in, and perpetuating, the stereotype that the Chinese—like the Moros—are magulang, they’ll pull a fast one on you at every turn.

Over the years, the sentiment has tapered off, thanks to the emergence of China as a world power, and thanks to the flood of Chinese goods coming this way. That stands to be resurrected unless the anti-Chinese stance is calibrated, refined, defined. Indeed, it stands to be reciprocated as we saw in the rowdy Hong Kong crowd’s reception of the Azkals.

I recall a lesson I learned in my activist days, when we were railing against American imperialism: Be careful to distinguish between American policy and the American people. By all means loathe the Vietnam War, but do not loathe the American people. By all means loathe Johnson and Nixon, but do not loathe the American people. By all means loathe aggression and invasion and occupation, but do not loathe the American people. The American policymakers you cannot have any solidarity with, the American people you can. The American imperialists you cannot be friends with, the American people you can.

Not always easy to do, but it can be done. It has to be done.

Ditto here. By all means loathe Chinese aggression, expansionism, imperialism. By all means rail against the Chinese leaders, the Chinese party members, the Chinese policymakers. But not China.

Not the Chinese people.

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter

More from this Column:

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=54855

Tags: China , China-Philippine bilateral ties , Chinese imperialism , fishing disputes , Ma Ying-jeou , maritime law enforcement , Philippine Coast Guard , Philippines , Taiwan , Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou , Taiwanese fisherman

  • Lakan Kildap

    “Doubtless, Leila de Lima’s decision had something to do with appeasing
    the Taiwanese. But quite apart from that, it is also, which is what her
    department is supposed to ensure, a matter of justice. National pride
    may not supersede it. Other considerations may not supersede it. The
    killing of a fisherman, Taiwanese or Filipino, is lamentable. The taking
    of a life, intentionally or out of recklessness, is unacceptable. If we
    are at fault, we should own it. If we are wrong, we should rectify it.”

    Buti na lang di naging abogado si De Quiros. It’s not national pride, Conrado, it’s called duty. The duty of every government in the world, of every nanay in the world, is to defend the anak. Wrong or not, pinaniniwalaan mo man o hindi ang dahilan niya, ang alibi niya, you always try to get the outcome that is most favorable para sa mamamayan mo.

  • @Palo Alto

    I am sure you have chinese blood with you and your dna does the talking. No and I disagree wholeheartedly and say no that we are the losers with the Taiwan conflict. Taiwan needs us more than we need them. We have other resources and can change plans anytime. Ofw is not here to stay and it will be weeded out soon and as fast as the country progresses.

    Taiwan needs a lot of educated filipinos to man their manufacturing because they can not understand basic english since all their materials for exports are labelled using the english language. They do not have enough manpower to handle their manufacturing. Sure, they can hire the indians and other people from other countries sent in boatloads like some merchandise. But they are all domestics, not the educated kind from the philippines working their factories.

    We have tourists all over the world and taiwan is just one little island and its not even a country of its own. And you know our not too long history during your activists days you said you were, we were once 2x the revenue of taiwan during the ’60s and ’70s, and I am sure we will be more than 4x that in due time.

    Yeah, the China component to Taiwan. What does it mean for us in the long run. Chinas development depends heavily from imports from countries like the Philippines for most of their components from metal ores to what have you.

    Yes, you are chinese and you are a bigot of your own chosen land.

Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


  • 4 more crew detained over S. Korea ferry disaster
  • Korea ferry captain promised ‘safe journey’ in 2010 video
  • Sherpas consider boycott after Everest disaster
  • Congressional probe on Naia’s ‘appalling global image’ sought
  • DPWH to push for total rehabilitation of fire-damaged Quezon Bridge
  • Sports

  • Reigning champs Miami open playoffs with win
  • Spurs subdue Mavericks in playoff opener
  • Wawrinka beats Federer to win Monte Carlo Masters
  • Ageless Hopkins pitches 50-50 Mayweather deal
  • Goodbye MGM, Las Vegas for Pacquiao?
  • Lifestyle

  • Miss America: Don’t suspend teen over prom invite
  • Transitions and resurrection in the performing arts
  • ‘Archaeology tour’ of Cebu’s heritage of faith
  • Historic Fort Bonifacio tunnel converted into a septic tank
  • ‘Imports’ from London, and play of the year
  • Entertainment

  • Discovery network cancels Everest jump
  • ‘Captain America’ stays strong atop US box office
  • Easter musings
  • Solenn in shorts
  • Unmerry mix of attention-calling moves on ‘Mini-Me’ TV tilts
  • Business

  • Oil prices down in quiet Asian trade
  • Asian shares mixed in holiday-thinned trade
  • BDO seen keen on bidding for Cocobank
  • Bataan freeport investment pledges up 1,302%
  • Golden Week
  • Technology

  • PH has slowest internet in Southeast Asia
  • Nintendo’s trailblazing Game Boy marks 25th anniversary
  • Nasa’s moon-orbiting robot crashes down
  • Netizens pay respects to Gabriel Garcia Marquez
  • Nokia recalls 30,000 chargers for Lumia 2520 tablet
  • Opinion

  • Gigi’s home
  • Palace stonewalls on MRT inquiry
  • Couple of things too
  • There is plenty of water behind Wawa Dam
  • Triduum thoughts of a young boy
  • Global Nation

  • Obama on mission to quiet Asia skeptics
  • Search for Etihad passengers launched
  • Japan presents $57-B ‘dream plan’ to solve Metro congestion
  • Tim Tebow’s charity hospital in Davao seen to open in 7 months
  • OFW died of Mers-CoV in Saudi Arabia, says family
  • Marketplace