At Large

Power, secrets and sanctity


My introduction to the brave new (for me) world of activism took place when I was in high school when I joined a picket against the Roman Catholic Church.

More specifically, it was a protest action launched by a group of students, most of us from “exclusive” Catholic schools, to exhort the Archdiocese of Manila, then headed by the late Rufino Cardinal Santos, to “open” its books to the laity. Although the words weren’t in current use then, it was a call for greater “transparency and accountability” in the way the archdiocese conducted its business. I don’t remember now what the cardinal’s or the archdiocese’s response was, or if they even bothered. But pretty soon, in the early 1970s, more urgent and life-and-death issues emerged and we young activists were soon battling the government.

Soon after the declaration of martial law, Cardinal Santos passed away and in his place the Vatican appointed a prelate with the funny and incredible name of Jaime Sin. Almost from the beginning, Sin (soon to be named a cardinal) enjoyed good press and he went out of his way to parlay his personality—jovial, outgoing, outspoken—into public popularity, burnishing along the way the image of the Archdiocese of Manila and of the Philippine Catholic Church. During martial law, the Church seemed to be the only institution capable of confronting the Marcos machinery, even if by then Cardinal Sin had declared his policy of “critical collaboration,” and even activists had pinned their hopes on it.

Certainly, Cardinal Sin seemed a pleasant, welcome contrast to the dour, aloof Cardinal Santos. The cardinal from Aklan enjoyed such a favorable public image, especially after he began speaking out against the more egregious abuses of the Marcos regime, that soon after the fraudulent elections of 1986, he lent his voice to marshal “People Power” and launch the Edsa Revolt that toppled the Marcoses. But have things changed?

* * *

The years after the triumph of 1986, which saw a newly-powerful Catholic Church, symbolized by Cardinal Sin, are the focus of the book “Altar of Secrets: Sex, Politics, and Money in the Philippine Catholic Church” by Aries Rufo. He is a journalist who has extensively covered the Church beat and has written investigative pieces on “scandals” involving prelates, mainly tales of sexual misconduct and financial shenanigans.

Now, sex and money are the lifeblood of muckraking journalism, but the stories told in “Altar of Secrets” gain sensational power mainly because they involve an institution that has wrapped itself in the mantle of holiness. More specifically, the main characters are men (and some women) who have somehow removed themselves from the scrutiny of other institutions—regulatory agencies, the police and the courts, even their constituency of the faithful—by claiming ethical and moral superiority. And, it must be said, blocking all attempts to hold them accountable—even though the Vatican seems to be able to gather the information it needs—to society, if not to God.

Before I proceed further, a confession of my own. Fresh from college, I worked in the information office of the Archdiocese of Manila and personally know many of the persons that Rufo discusses in his book. I thus read the book with increasing dismay, disbelief, chagrin and disappointment.

* * *

It strikes me that Rufo seems to rely on quite a sparse selection of cases which form the core of “Altar of Secrets.” There is the closure of Monte de Piedad, the bank that used to be owned by the Archdiocese of Manila (and owes its origins to a “charity fund” that began during the Spanish era) that was lost due to mismanagement, malfeasance, and abuse by its board members, some of them priests.

Then there’s the failure to disclose the disbursement of the money collected through a public fund-raising for Radio Veritas (Philippines), which played a crucial role in the Edsa Revolt.

There’s also the dispute between Parañaque Bishop Jesse Mercado and lay leaders over accountability over money raised in regular collections and special fund-raising drives for flood victims, among others.

The “politics” part is covered in a discussion of the contentious relations between the Catholic bishops and Malacañang over family planning, among other issues.

But there is also the revelation that a “Malacañang diocese” held (or still holds?) sway among the bishops, composed of a clique of prelates supportive of the embattled former president, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

And the “sex” part? There are rehashed accounts of the familiar cases involving former Bishop Crisostomo Yalung, retired Bishop Teodoro Bacani, the case of retired Bishop Cirilo Almario of Bulacan, even allegations against retired Bishop Ted Buhain. Rufo even mentions the Archdiocese of Pampanga which is reportedly “notorious” for the number of priests involved in dangerous liaisons and fathering a small barangay of young Catholics. Not sexual in nature, but indicative of the prelates’ attitude toward women, is the case of a nun accused of theft by a bishop and subjected to public humiliation.

* * *

While the scandals that Rufo recounts are indeed troubling and disturbing, he does include in the narrative instances when reformers among the bishops and especially among lay leaders stepped in and saved the day.

The Vatican is also reported as stepping in when a scandal appears to have ramifications way beyond the secretive, reclusive world in which much of the Church resides. But as we all know, the Church of Rome is not itself free of intrigue and wrongdoing.

Perhaps the call that galvanized us young activists all those decades ago remains just as valid and necessary today. It’s time lay people stepped up and met the challenge.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Noel Noel Munro

    huli krap aytem.


    Of course if Rufo wrote about The Altar of Impunity: Sex, Money, Murders and Philippine Politicians, he might not live long enough to savour his fame. It’s always more fun and safer to “attack” and “expose” churchmen who don’t have the power nor the inclination to silence critics. How about Rufo taking a crack at Ping Lacson, or Chavit Singson, or Mike Velarde, or about Rudy Farinas, Iglesia ni Manalo, or Bong Pineda? That would be brave of Rufo indeed. And would be more productive, not a waste of ink or saliva.

    • brunogiordano

      Si Rufo ay mas matapang kaysa sa mga umaatake sa may kapangyarihan na kayang magpatahimik.

      Ang inaatake niya ay mga tao may kapangyarihan ipagkait sa kanya ang SALVATION na pinakamimithi ng mga maka-DAMASO.

  • brunogiordano

    “Perhaps the call that galvanized us young activists all those decades ago remains just as valid and necessary today. It’s time lay people stepped up and met the challenge.”

    Dahil sa sinimulan ninyo marami na ngayon ang mulat sa mabaho at nakadidiring anomalia ng mga kaparian na hindi na nila mapasisinungalingan.

    Ilan na lang ngayon ang mga maka-DAMASO na mga nakikinabang sa katiwalian nagaganap sa kaparian.

  • buninay1

    The how part is vague and left to the discretion of the lay people.

  • just_anotherperson

    It seems that people expect the Catholic Church, which is run by imperfect men to be perfect. Never in the history of the Church has it been perfect. Our Lord said that his kingdom is not of this world so do not expect to see a world free of evil and injustice even in the Catholic Church.

    The Lord also said to Peter, you are rock and upon this rock I will build my church. The Catholic Church is the only one with an unbroken line of succession from Peter until today’s Pope Francis. The Lord also said to Peter, “I tell you the truth, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven”. The popes starting from Peter, though imperfect and many are unworthy, have not erred in teaching matters of faith and morals once they became the Vicar of our Lord.

    I am not saying that what Rufo wrote are true. It is just as truthful as what a person with an anti-catholic bias will allow.

    • brunogiordano

      “It seems that people expect the Catholic Church, which is run by imperfect men to be perfect”

      TUMPAK ang iyong tinuran.

      Ang mga pari at obispo DAMASO dito sa atin ay pinag pangapan na sila ay SUGO ng diyos kaya sila daw ay perrfect.

      Dahil sila ay SUGO ng diyos ang sinumang sumuway sa utos nila ay hindi daw makararating sa pangakong kingdom.

      Ngayon OBVIOUS at BISTADO na ang kanilang mga kasinugalingan, iyong ilan maka-DAMASO na lang ang naniniwala sa kanila.

      • just_anotherperson

        Mas ok ang maka-DAMASO kesa maka-DEMNYO

      • brunogiordano

        May mga pari at obispong DAMASO pa. Kaya may mga maka-DAMASO pa rin.

        DEMNYO, wala noon. Kaya walang mga maka- DEMNYO.

        Try again.

    • tarikan

      Heard of the word “infallible”? Perhaps not. This is the solid-as-can be defense of the Church especially the Vatican.

    • panhase

      “The popes … have not erred in teaching matters of faith and morals..”
      Teaching is also done by example, do you really want people to post some examples of “not erring” in matters of morals by popes? History is full of erring popes, I am sure you are well aware of that. So better refrain from posting something like that unless you want to invite some not so favourable responses.

      • just_anotherperson

        So what teachings on faith and morals has the Pope made an error?

        I would guess you would say that unknown edict banishing jews from Rome. It is not church teaching to banish jews from Rome. LOL.

      • panhase

        You are a very clever person di ba? Who talked about “the” Pope? You yourself used “popes” in your first comment, care to take a look? Then read my reply to your posting, but slowly this time so you might comprehend what is said.

        And banishing Jews from Rome? Your arguing against something that was not there before you mentioned it now in your reply. With this you are arguing against what you yourself brought into the discussion in order to make it appear that you refute my statement, when in fact you are arguing against yourself. Well this rhetoric trick is not exactly new but also not sincere. You can´t do better than this?

  • FireEngine

    The Church, being an institution run by all sorts of persons, some of questionable morals, is indeed always in need of reform. I think the last paragraph of your column, exhorting the young and idealistic to get involved, is a good idea really. Just look what a Cardinal Sin, Pope John Paul II, and now even Pope Francis, can do to reform it and change its image. Maybe one day we can see the end to the incessant “Damaso,” “Mitsubishops,” and pedophilia tags from critics.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks

May 29, 2015

Double standards

May 28, 2015

A yearly problem