Quantcast
Latest Stories

Charity, please

EDITORIAL CARTOON

A PASTORAL letter from Archbishop Socrates Villegas of Lingayen-Dagupan strikes a note not often heard in the controversy over the reproductive health bill pending in Congress: moderation. “We want to make a plea for greater charity even as we passionately state our positions on this divisive issue. At the end of the heated debates, we will all be winners if we proclaim the truths we believe in with utmost charity, courtesy and respect for one another.”

The pastoral statement will only be read in all churches in the archdiocese of Lingayen-Dagupan this Sunday, but already it is making the rounds, passed from hand to hand or e-mail account to e-mail account. It is not hard to see why; the letter is a welcome call for the “triumph of reason and sobriety.” In the same spirit of charity and candor, however, we must point out an unsettling truth: the archbishop’s statement is better directed at some of his fellow bishops and priests who have led the fire-and-brimstone opposition to the RH bill.

Even before the present Congress convened, some leaders of the Roman Catholic Church in the heat of the election campaign last year already issued threats to excommunicate those political candidates who supported a reproductive health agenda. That hostile stance, lacking in the very “charity, courtesy and respect” Archbishop Villegas now speaks of, set the tone for much of the Church’s engagement with the RH bill issue. Since then, the extremist position was reinforced by threat after high-profile threat: of communion being possibly withheld, of churchgoers known for their pro-RH bill position being told they were unwelcome in church, of RH bill advocates being harassed by chants of “Your mother should have aborted you.” While the true Church teaching on the vexing issue of contraception is well-reasoned and even nuanced (as Pope Benedict XVI’s remarks in “Light of the World” proved), the extremist position adopted by a number of bishops and priests and laymen became absurdly reductionist, equating the concept of reproductive health itself with either abortion or licentiousness.

(There is also the not insignificant matter of Villegas’ predecessor, Archbishop Oscar Cruz, adopting a stance against President Aquino that could only be categorized as personal, including his uncharitable notion, certainly not something that will find support in the Church’s teachings, that a man like the President who is past 50 is effectively disqualified from a happy marriage.)

The lack of charity, courtesy and respect touched bottom when a bishop decided it was time to pull out of the high-level dialogue with Malacañang, because Malacañang, he said, was no longer open to discussion. In fact it is the bishops who can be accused of inflexibility in position.

Thus, when Villegas writes the following—“The past few months have seen many of us who belong to the same Church and who share the same faith in Christ at odds with one another on the issue of the reproductive health bill in Congress. It is indeed sad and perhaps even scandalous for non-Christians to see the Catholic flock divided among themselves and some members of the Catholic lay faithful at odds with their own pastors. If we fail to have love, we make ourselves orphans.”—charity and candor impel us to point out that sometimes the orphaning is done by the pastors themselves.

We do not wish to suggest that the Villegas pastoral letter can be interpreted as being pro-RH bill. The good bishop’s appeal to a return to conscience is based squarely on the serene conviction that the right thing to do is to oppose the bill. “We pray conscience does not allow itself to be swayed by statistics or partisan political positions. The only voice conscience must listen to is the voice of God.” Elsewhere he also writes: “The issue of contraception belongs to the realm of faith not opinions.”

But he exemplifies his own appeal for reasoned debate, and it is a call we should heed. “We appeal to our Catholic brethren who stand on opposing sides on the reproductive health bill to return to the voice of conscience, to state their positions and rebut their opponents always with charity.” Now that is something all Filipino Catholics can agree on.


More from this Column:

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: pastoral letter , RH bill , Roman Catholic church

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.


Copyright 2011 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Arroyo hopes gov’t will uphold rule of law, laments campaign vs Arroyos
  • An eyewitness or Justice Sereno testifying could save prosecution, says Santiago
  • Enrile junks De Lima’s testimony as hearsay
  • Honasan to prosecution: Tell court your plans to avoid ‘unpleasant surprises’
  • Shelling kills 2 Western journalists in Syria
  • Sports

  • Westbrook, Durant power Thunder past Celtics
  • Jeremy Lin to miss dunk moment but will fill bookshelves
  • Pacquiao ‘embarrassed’ by Mayweather offer
  • Manny Pacquiao swept up in Linsanity
  • Don’t wait for P-Noy to save boxing
  • Lifestyle

  • PF Chang’s first Asian branch opens–to long wait lists
  • ‘Tikuron or tikoy turon’
  • Oriental Citrus Salad, Herb Pan-fried Fish–Mama Maimee, it’s good ol’ comfort food!
  • Burrata Cheese Ravioli, Burger with Foie Gras, ‘snowball tiramisu’–chow time in Hong Kong
  • ‘Udang Goreng Chilli Garam’ (Chili Prawns)–a Peranakan favorite
  • Entertainment

  • Sepia-tinted statuettes? Oscar films look to past
  • ‘Bourne’ star leaves ‘legacy’ in Palace visit
  • Through the years …
  • As Pinoy as the jeepney
  • Modern-day superhero
  • Business

  • Oil prices lower on weak Europe, China data
  • No change in PSE index
  • Again, oil firms up prices
  • PPP schools project attracts 15 firms
  • Surging crude oil prices worry BSP
  • Technology

  • US attorneys general pressure Google on privacy
  • Company sues Apple over iPad name in Shanghai
  • Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom released on bail
  • New York taxis could get iPads—report
  • Google under fire for sidestepping track-blocking software
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, February 23, 2012
  • Wisdom, not legality
  • People power
  • The algorithm of kindness
  • ‘Medicare portability’ for Fil-Ams
  • Global Nation

  • Philippine Immigration issues reminder on annual reporting of aliens
  • Okay to buy warships but don’t bring US into Spratly dispute
  • Ibuna lawyer: Aleli not Ignacio Arroyo’s legal wife due to technicality
  • Government lifts ‘au pair’ ban to Europe
  • Former Pagcor chief denies getting gifts from Okada
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2011 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved