Public Lives

The return of traditional politics in Pampanga


From the moment we first beheld the unique magic of people power in 1986, we have scanned the political horizon for signs of its recurrence. The possibility that it will appear again gives us eternal hope. Its unpredictability, however, keeps us guessing when and in what form it will happen again. Its elusiveness tells us that while it can catalyze reform, it doesn’t linger long enough to form the basis for enduring change.

What we don’t realize is that for every euphoric moment that people power brings, there is a corresponding price that we pay whenever we are unable to build on its foundation—cynicism and despair. Every letdown weighs so heavily on those who trust in its redemptive powers that they lose their taste for long struggles.

Nothing perhaps illustrates this cycle more vividly than the debacle that followed the extraordinary rise to political power of the Catholic priest Eddie T. Panlilio, who, in 2007, ran as an independent candidate for governor of Pampanga, offering himself as the alternative to the two entrenched dynastic forces of traditional politics in the province—the Lapids and the Pinedas. The Commission on Elections declared him the winner by a very slim margin in that three-cornered fight. His improbable victory, which the mass media romanticized as a small version of Cory Aquino’s iconic run against Ferdinand Marcos in 1986, was reversed by the same Comelec a few months before the election of 2010.

When the Comelec ordered Panlilio to turn over his office to Lilia “Baby” Pineda, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s long-time friend, no people-power outrage exploded in his behalf. In the almost three years he served as governor of Pampanga, “Among Ed” had managed to alienate most of his followers. The latter saw a side of him they did not notice before—a self-righteousness that is given to preaching rather than to listening. His aura as someone anointed by people power vanished so quickly that soon the staunchest of his supporters were joining his enemies in filing cases against him.

When they saw that his own leaders were deserting him, his enemies began bombarding him with cases and petitions that virtually made it impossible for him to govern. Having entered the provincial government with no other elected official by his side to help him wage the arduous struggle for reform, he found himself beleaguered by a provincial board and a mayors’ league that could not see anything positive in what he was doing. Instead of reaching out to them, he, in turn, became more hostile toward them, seeing their attacks as a confirmation of their moral bankruptcy.

Panlilio’s archenemy, Lilia Pineda, the wife of Bong Pineda, Central Luzon’s alleged king of “jueteng,” marshaled all her forces and kept the pressure on to prevent his reelection in 2010.  Even as she waited for the results of the electoral protest she filed, her group, known as “Kambilan,” launched a recall campaign against the sitting governor that produced more than 200,000 signatories. This far exceeded the percentage required to bring the process to its logical end—the unseating of the incumbent and the holding of a new election.

As anyone could see, the forces of traditional politics were busy organizing, while the adherents of reform were kept occupied parrying the blows that came their way. Pineda treated all this as a dress rehearsal for the decisive return bout in 2010, a presidential election year. She knew, as a veteran politician, that the presidential contest could shape the outcome of local contests. Panlilio entered the gubernatorial race of 2010, not as a reelectionist, but as someone who had been wrongly declared the winner in the previous election. He had, by this time, all but lost the support of his middle-class base. His candidacy would have been dismissed as inconsequential had he not been designated head of the Liberal Party, whose standard-bearer was the popular Benigno S. Aquino III.

But, not even P-Noy’s phenomenal dash for the presidency could help revive the spirit of people power that swept Panlilio into office in 2007. While P-Noy took Pampanga by a huge majority in 2010, Panlilio trailed Pineda all the way in the gubernatorial race. For every vote he received, Pineda got two.

As a Kapampangan himself, P-Noy wanted to alter the terrain of Pampanga politics during his presidency so as to diminish the pernicious hold of the Arroyo-Pineda alliance on the province. But he could not go very far in Pampanga as long as Panlilio remained his main organizer. On the other hand, prominent figures like former San Fernando Mayor and now Representative-elect Oscar Rodriguez were hesitant to challenge the political and economic clout of the Pinedas. The 2013 elections proved them right. Pineda won almost 80 percent of the vote. But more telling as an indicator of the retreat of people power was the number of votes that Among Ed received—a measly 125,407 votes. This was substantially less than the 242,367 votes he got in 2010.

Pineda felt secure enough in her post that, rather than wait until the end of her term, she positioned her son Dennis for succession by fielding him as her candidate for vice governor. Yet, like a pragmatic politician of long standing, she knew how to play her cards. She dropped her Lakas-Kampi affiliation, and ran and fielded candidates under the banner of her local group, Kambilan. She supported P-Noy ally Rodriguez against a former staunch Arroyo ally, Aurelio “Dong” Gonzales Jr., in the congressional race of Pampanga’s third district.

That is how traditional politics sustains itself over the long haul.

* * *

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Paliwaweng

    Professor David said it well.
    btw, his colleague here in Inquirer, Mon Tulfo is amazingly singing a different tune.
    His previous column, comparing Panlilio to Pineda is the worst, and one of the biggest lie I’ve ever seen.
    One can be tempted to think of Pineda, being the shrewd as she was, are keeping some journalists on her payroll.

    • Mamang Pulis

      naulanan si tulfing….ganoon lang yun

      • Moonworshipper

        Iyan ang mukha ng mass media kaya di mahinto ang corruption. Nababayaran ang tagabantay ng bayan.

    • John_Cruz

      A lot of US Navy retirees are being killed in the Philippines. USN retiree as ordinary citizen got killed will be reported by the news media. If USN retiree is a businessman got killed news media will not report. Still the news spread very quickly in USA.

    • tugakbatan

      Yes, there are rumors of numerous and prevalent briberies by the Pineda Clan, not only to some journalists but also to some priests, including Archbiship Aniceto. Most of the mayors and other elected officials are on their side. I guess Pampanga will be ruled by the Pinedas as long as Huweteng thrives in this province, with the mother as the governor, the son being the vice governor, a daughter being a mayor in Lubao, and a daughter in-law being a mayor in Santa Rita. QUO VADIS KAPAMPANGAN!

      • John_Cruz

        The Bondocs of Macabebe beats Pineda’s Manok, Jerry Pelayo of Candaba.

      • doncleo

        okay lang ang political dynasty sa Pampanga at wala naman daw nagrereklamo eh sabi ni Boybakal.

  • boybakal

    People will not get tired of politicians.
    This election some political families were accused of Political Dynasty.
    A campaign of anti dynasty was launched….but people voted their choice.
    Now, after the win of this political families back to trapos or Traditional Politics.

    Filipinos are intelligent people, they concurred in electing the candidates who they think is for them….majority were right, they have the same choice.

    Dynasty, Traditional politics….it is only a creation description of wandering mind.

    • doncleo

      where have you been?

  • JLFS

    People Power should not be used again to unseat an incombent. Cory and Panlilio are of the same kind, unprepared to govern. Officials to be elected should be a member a Political Party with ready program of government.

    • doncleo

      program on jueteng and corruption?

  • Mamang Pulis

    si among napagkaisahan—iniwanan sa ere….

    ano pa kya ang author ng daang matuwid——kung walang panuhol na pork barrel?

    susunod kya ang mga tongresista at senador?

    tangala mo kya ng 200m budget—-hindi kya mag alsa mga yan? :D

  • Kenjie Hasaki

    If they were to survive, a true politician aligned themselves to the strongest!

  • pipsirho

    Do not expect short-term solutions to bring long-term results. People Power movements are actually short-term measures to address immediate political obstacles to peoples’ aspirations. Take the case of EDSA 1, its principal objective was to remove Marcos and nothing else; a short-term goal. when it was launched there were no long-term objectives and programs to pursue; the messages to restore democracy were just platitudes to embellish the movement. Behind the scenes were traditional politicians who plotting to consolidate their power base. Take the Cojuangcos, Sumulongs, Tanjuatcos, Oretas, and other aspiring political personalities who used their identification with people power as a means to solidify their ascendancy to political power like Binay, Belmonte, Arroyo, Enrile, Biazon, and many more.

  • boybakal

    Pampanga does not need to complain.
    It is best province in the country.
    Kapampangans are self sufficient, organized, business oriented.
    Kapampangans are well educated, most of all beautiful people.

    Their leaders particularly GMA has helped the province a lot.
    What more can you ask….whether Traditional Politics or Dynasty….No need to complain who governs.
    Pampanga is great because of its people and leaders only secondary.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks

June 02, 2015

Political patronage

June 01, 2015

Ready to rumble