Quantcast

Palace too ‘cryptic’ on use of coco fund


Recent events show how coconut farmers are more than eager to know about the status of the P71-billion coco levy fund which has been in the hands of government since October 2012. The amount came from the redemption and dividends of the controversial CIIF-SMC preferred shares (converted from common shares) entrusted by the Supreme Court to the government as “special public funds.” The Sept. 17, 2012 Supreme Court decision categorically ruled the shares to be public funds that may be used “only for the benefit of all coconut farmers and for the development of the industry.”

Clearly, therefore, coconut farmers should be the direct participants and beneficiaries of any development effort bankrolled with the funds. But even with the various court rulings to this effect, there remains a great deal of uncertainty as to how the funds will be managed and used to the advantage of the poor coconut farmers.

A big slice of the coco levy fund, P56.5 billion, has been forwarded to the National Treasury while the remaining P14 billion is being kept in the Trust Department of the United Coconut Planters Bank (UCPB); each has a different set of interest rate applied. We have yet to hear a logical explanation for this.

Since the coco levy has had a history of being taken advantage of by a few privileged cronies, it is but fitting that the farmers be more vigilant against any misuse of the funds and demand maximum transparency in government’s handling of the same. Unfortunately, Malacañang is rather “cryptic” in its statements regarding the funds. It is not specific on how the P71 billion may be used to benefit the more than 20,000 coconut barangays in the country. Coconut farmers, obviously, do not have the convenience of waiting for another decade for such long-overdue benefits.

There had been efforts from the Department of Agriculture to consult with coco farmer groups regarding management and use of the funds. There are also some miscued industry development roadmaps being pursued by some government agencies. Some even propose the use of the funds to rehabilitate the coco levy-funded companies which for decades had not delivered any benefits for the farmers. Then there is Cocofed which, after losing the case in court, still has the gall to present itself as the rightful administrator of the funds. But like it or not, the ultimate decision will have to come from President Aquino himself.

It has been three years since P-Noy has taken the helm of government but, to this day, he has not said a single word regarding the coco levy—an issue that affects almost a third of our population, which directly or indirectly depends on the coconut industry for survival. More serious vigilance may be expected from the organized coconut farmer groups that have been fighting for justice which is now, more than ever, so within the coconut farmers’ reach.

—VADESHNA A. SURIO,

program assistant,

Coconut Industry Reform Movement,

coir_inc@yahoo.com


Follow Us


Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Other Stories:

No related posts found!

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=47289

Tags: coco levy fund , Coconut farmers , letters , malacanang



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement

News

  • Seabed search for missing Malaysian jet to widen
  • Lacson rejects calls to name ‘pork’ execs
  • Obama due in Seoul as North Korea nuclear test fears grow
  • Hold departure order out vs Corona, Singson
  • Malaysia to release MH370 report–PM
  • Sports

  • Michael Phelps loses to Lochte in comeback meet
  • Sharapova advances to Stuttgart quarterfinals
  • Galedo caps ride of redemption
  • Beermen, Express dispute second semis slot today
  • Lady Agilas upset Lady Bulldogs in four sets
  • Lifestyle

  • ‘Recovered’ Banksy works on display ahead of sale
  • Marinduque: Visiting the ‘palm of the ocean’
  • First at Vatican in 60 years
  • How Jing Monis Salon gave Krissy the pixie
  • Want to be a supermodel? Work on your inner beauty, says Joey Espino
  • Entertainment

  • Paul McCartney to play at Candlestick concert
  • Kristoffer Martin: from thug to gay teen
  • Has Ai Ai fallen deeply with ‘sireno?’
  • California court won’t review Jackson doctor case
  • Cris Villonco on play adapted from different medium
  • Business

  • PAL hailed for ban on shark fin cargo
  • BSP to change tint of P100 bill
  • Nielsen sees car buying boom in the Philippines
  • How author of best-seller exposed ‘one percent’ economic elite
  • Bangko Sentral readies new bank lending rules
  • Technology

  • Cloud strength helps Microsoft earnings top Street
  • Vatican announces hashtag for April 27 canonizations
  • Enrile in Masters of the Universe, Lord of the Rings?
  • Top Traits of Digital Marketers
  • No truth to viral no-visa ‘chronicles’
  • Opinion

  • Corruption not invincible after all
  • Editorial Cartoon, April 25, 2014
  • No deal, Janet
  • Like making Al Capone a witness vs his gang
  • MERS-CoV and mothers
  • Global Nation

  • China welcomes PH apology
  • Only 4 Etihad passengers not accounted for
  • Abandoned in Malta,15 PH seamen return
  • Senator hopes PH will also get same vow
  • HK victims to get P115M; traders raised money
  • Marketplace