Not so innocent passage

It’s almost a formula on how to lose your ally’s confidence. Send in a minesweeper apparently on the stealth, and be found out when it runs aground due to faulty navigation, and in an internationally protected haven for fragile marine life at that.

But if the incident is a reminder of the lingering American military presence in Philippine waters, then let it be a reminder not just to the Filipinos but to the Chinese as well. Instead of being forced to choose between crying sovereignty and crying uncle, we must “seize the day, seize the hour,” in the words of Chairman Mao himself, and marshal our international mandate and our sovereign power to protect our prized reefs. Tubbataha is indubitably within our waters, separated from their “dotted-U” line by the whole stretch of Palawan island—but the message of a deterrent US presence in our region still comes across loud and clear. But for us to make the most of a bad situation, first we must lay responsibility where it should lie.

The Tubbataha Reef is protected by Unesco as a World Heritage Site and by Philippine law as well as a coral sanctuary. Republic Act No. 10067, or the Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park Act of 2009, has declared it “off-limits to navigation” and has banned the “unauthorized entry” of vessels except in emergency situations or with prior permission from our own Tubbataha authorities. Violators are subject to imprisonment and a fine, apart from being held to pay for damages to the reef.

The United States can very well claim that its vessel was merely exercising the right of innocent passage. International law, whether treaty or custom, recognizes that “[p]assage is innocent so long as it is not prejudicial to the peace, good order or security of the coastal State.” After all, the ship was merely passing through after routine refueling and resupply at Subic Bay, presumably authorized under the Visiting Forces Agreement. Yet even the VFA recognizes Philippine jurisdiction to punish “offenses committed within the Philippines and punishable under the law of the Philippines.” When the VFA declares that “it is the duty of US personnel to respect the laws of the Republic of the Philippines,” certainly that includes the Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park Act. The real affront to our sovereignty was when the USS Guardian’s commander refused inspection by the Tubbataha park rangers and even ordered his crew into battle position when our rangers tried to approach their ship.

Until today, it remains a mystery: “Why were they even near Tubbataha? The Sulu Sea is so vast, and it takes 10 hours from Puerto Princesa to reach it. Why couldn’t they see it when they had all the state-of-the-art maps and navigation systems?” asked Jose Ma. Lorenzo, World Wildlife Fund-Philippines chief executive officer.

The USS Guardian incident presents the Philippines with a unique opportunity to enlist global support from the environmental community abroad, including powerful voices from within the United States, while asserting its sovereignty. In other words, this is one episode where US military authorities have to contend with outrage not just from foreigners but from their own. Our diplomats should therefore work hand in hand with Filipino NGOs to mobilize the environmentalists, internationally and within the United States, to pressure the American government to cooperate fully with Philippine investigators.

We can investigate the incident at different levels. Our VFA commission should verify the passage of the vessel through Philippine waters, and ascertain whether the Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park Act was violated when the ship’s commander resisted inspection and when his ship eventually ran aground. That law also empowers our own Tubbataha authorities to protect the sanctuary. Finally, our senators, many of whom have openly protested the incursion, can likewise launch their own legislative inquiry, especially since the House of Representatives has passed a bill that would strangely allow international passage through part of the protected reefs, and it is left to the Senate to stop it.

In the past, the Philippine government had had to struggle to assert its sovereignty, especially in the famous “Nicole” rape prosecution and, not too well known, the 2009 collision near Subic of a Chinese submarine and an underwater sonar device towed by the destroyer USS John S. McCain. This time, we wouldn’t be alone in our outrage. Investigate we must. Full steam ahead.

Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter

More from this Column:

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=45401

Tags: editorial , tubbataha reefs , us navy ship incident , world heritage site

Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


  • Tagle to Napoles: Be honest and return the money
  • Afghan hospital guard kills 3 American doctors
  • Obama rejects notion that trade deal is in danger
  • [VIDEO] No assurances on Janet Lim-Napoles’ bid to become state witness
  • South Sudan president fires long-time army leader
  • Sports

  • Pacquiao can dodge tax issues
  • F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone rejects bribery charges
  • Big Chill freezes Cafe France to arrest skid
  • Pacquiao has to go through PBA Rookie draft
  • Guiao summoned by PBA for name-calling incident
  • Lifestyle

  • Gongs and southern dances star in a workshop at San Francisco Bayanihan Center
  • This woman ate what?
  • Photos explore dynamics of youths’ sexual identity
  • 12th Philippine Food Expo set at the World Trade Center
  • No tourist draw, Malang the croc will remain wild
  • Entertainment

  • Smithsonian wants photos, videos for ‘Day in the Life of Asian Pacific Americans’
  • What Garcia Marquez left behind
  • Has Ai Ai fallen deeply with ‘sireno?’
  • Sony developing live-action Barbie comedy
  • California court won’t review Jackson doctor case
  • Business

  • Metro Pacific acquires stake in Victorias
  • How ‘one percent’ economic elite was uncovered
  • Facebook profits triple as mobile soars
  • Insular Honors Sales Performers at Testimonial Rites
  • Apple increases stock buyback, will split stock
  • Technology

  • Enrile in Masters of the Universe, Lord of the Rings?
  • Top Traits of Digital Marketers
  • No truth to viral no-visa ‘chronicles’
  • ‘Unlimited’ Internet promos not really limitless; lawmakers call for probe
  • Viber releases new design for iPhone, comes to Blackberry 10 for the first time
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, April 24, 2014
  • Talking to Janet
  • Respite
  • Bucket list
  • JPII in 1981: walking a tightrope
  • Global Nation

  • Obama to visit Filipino soldiers in Fort Bonifacio
  • Fil-Am youth conferences unite under one theme
  • Embassy advisory: Filipinos still need visas to enter US
  • No travel restriction to Mideast, DFA clarifies
  • PH-HK relations repaired, but families of victims still being courted
  • Marketplace