Sugarland owner seeks DAR’s help
MY SUGARLAND was covered by the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program of the government.
However, it was an error by the Department of Agrarian Reform to subject my property to Presidential Decree No. 27 considering that it was a sugarland at the time it was taken by the government 20 years ago. Such fact is well supported by the certification issued on May 1, 1994, by the right-of-way officer of the National Power Corp., who caused damages to my sugarcane plantation during the construction by Napocor of its 69KV and 138KV transmission lines in the area.
I offered my sugarland to the government under the Voluntary Offer to Sell, but until now nothing has come of it.
In this regard, may I seek the help of concerned government officials in having my long-pending case, DCN 13681-LV titled “George P. Arevalo vs DAR, LBP,” immediately resolved by the Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board (Darab). This case refers to my motion for recommendation which I filed five years ago, and which has never been decided on.
I am now aging and in ill-health, and I hope to enjoy my sugarland of which I had been deprived for so many years.
—GEORGE P. AREVALO SR.,
West Drive, Daro,
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94