The limits in using pre-audit safeguard
Philippine Daily Inquirer
I agree with Sancho Caceres (Inquirer, 10/24/12)—“pre-audit is the best way to safeguard people’s money.” However, pre-audit is not a 100-percent guarantee that there will be no anomalies in government transactions. I can cite two instances where corruption can occur even in a pre-audit regime:
1. When the auditors are in connivance with the wrongdoers.
2. The auditors assigned are incompetent.
We have heard of Commission on Audit auditors in cahoots with “bad guys,” and non-CPAs being employed by the COA simply because of their political connections. Besides, if the pre-audit would be required in all government transactions, there would be a slowdown in doing business with the government.
I suggest a compromise: Clarify which transactions would require pre-audit and those that would allow post-audit.
—BERNARDO V. PERALTA, CPA, retired professor and reviewer in auditing, Jones Avenue, Cebu City
Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=41553