Quantcast

Robbery made to look ‘legitimate’


The celebration of Consumer Welfare Month 2012 ended on Oct. 28.  How much public awareness of consumer rights and protection did it generate? How much protection do our consumers get from predatory companies, big and small, who are out to take advantage of unwary or hapless consumers? Here’s an example of how robbery is made to look legitimate in business.

Our 42-inch TV bought in 2009 just would not switch on. No power. This, despite its not being used often (it generates so much heat). The nearest authorized service center gave us a quote (after a few days) of P12,000 for the repair; I was asked to pay the “diagnostic fee” of P700. I was told that the amount would be credited as part of the overall payment. Fair enough, I thought.  Upon my request for a breakdown of costs, I was shown P7,500 for four parts that were supposed to be replaced and P4,500 for labor, “… with three months warranty on same problem.” After complaining to the service center’s head office by e-mail (cc: Department of Trade and Industry), the service center decided to give me a 10-percent discount. I still found the price exorbitant, so I decided to pull out my TV after paying them the imposed diagnostic fee.

But here comes the good news. A few weeks after, a technician recommended by an appliance dealer sales assistant came over and fixed my TV within two hours! For how much? Only P380 for a new power supply transistor diode. When I asked how much he would charge for labor, to my surprise he said “Bahala na po kayo, sir” (It’s up to you, sir). I asked if P500 was fair enough, and he replied “Tama na po yun, sir.” (That’s good enough, sir). I was so touched by his honesty and efficiency, I gave him a total of P1,000 plus some goodies from our cupboard for his family. He was just as happy as I was when he rode off on his motorbike.

But how many consumers are as fortunate as I was to come across honest persons like that TV technician? Isn’t there a law against overpricing? Meanwhile, I say, caveat emptor (buyer, beware)!

—E. J. T. TIRONA,

BF Homes Parañaque


Follow Us


Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Other Stories:

No related posts found!

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=41295

Tags: consumer protection , consumer welfare month , letters



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement

News

  • Afghan hospital guard kills 3 American doctors
  • [VIDEO] No assurances on Janet Lim-Napoles’ bid to become state witness
  • South Sudan president fires long-time army leader
  • Grenade explodes outside MPD Station 1
  • 25 cops ordered relieved over links to drugs
  • Sports

  • Pacquiao can dodge tax issues
  • F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone rejects bribery charges
  • Big Chill freezes Cafe France to arrest skid
  • Pacquiao has to go through PBA Rookie draft
  • Guiao summoned by PBA for name-calling incident
  • Lifestyle

  • Gongs and southern dances star in a workshop at San Francisco Bayanihan Center
  • This woman ate what?
  • Photos explore dynamics of youths’ sexual identity
  • 12th Philippine Food Expo set at the World Trade Center
  • No tourist draw, Malang the croc will remain wild
  • Entertainment

  • Smithsonian wants photos, videos for ‘Day in the Life of Asian Pacific Americans’
  • What Garcia Marquez left behind
  • Has Ai Ai fallen deeply with ‘sireno?’
  • Sony developing live-action Barbie comedy
  • California court won’t review Jackson doctor case
  • Business

  • Metro Pacific acquires stake in Victorias
  • How ‘one percent’ economic elite was uncovered
  • Facebook profits triple as mobile soars
  • Insular Honors Sales Performers at Testimonial Rites
  • Apple increases stock buyback, will split stock
  • Technology

  • Enrile in Masters of the Universe, Lord of the Rings?
  • Top Traits of Digital Marketers
  • No truth to viral no-visa ‘chronicles’
  • ‘Unlimited’ Internet promos not really limitless; lawmakers call for probe
  • Viber releases new design for iPhone, comes to Blackberry 10 for the first time
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, April 24, 2014
  • Talking to Janet
  • Respite
  • Bucket list
  • JPII in 1981: walking a tightrope
  • Global Nation

  • Obama to visit Filipino soldiers in Fort Bonifacio
  • Fil-Am youth conferences unite under one theme
  • Embassy advisory: Filipinos still need visas to enter US
  • No travel restriction to Mideast, DFA clarifies
  • PH-HK relations repaired, but families of victims still being courted
  • Marketplace