Jury system better, balanced | Inquirer Opinion

Jury system better, balanced

/ 10:08 PM June 14, 2012

Asuncion David Maramba’s commentary, titled “Fariñas’ plain talk” (Inquirer, 6/4/12) is exactly what most everyone felt. Our intelligence was being insulted and we were being made to believe the unbelievable. If the impeachment trial were tried in a regular court, the legalese, devoid of common sense, would have prevailed and Renato Corona would have been acquitted.

There is a lot of merit in having a jury system, where bribing a judge is more difficult, and unbelievable, ridiculous lawyer language and legalese can be balanced by common sense and a shared sense of justice by the jury members representing a cross-section of the citizenry.

—JL YULO,

[email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: impeachment trial, jury system, letters, Renato corona

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.