Quantcast
Latest Stories

Senators perceptive enough to weigh whether evidence is admissible or not

Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, presiding officer of the impeachment court, asked during the Jan. 24 hearing, how and in what way he should be liberal, and if he should allow leading questions, hearsay evidence, etc. He raised the point when lead prosecutor Rep. Niel Tupaz Jr. appealed for the liberal application of the rules on evidence.

It now seems to be the consensus that the impeachment court is sui generis, quasi-judicial and quasi-political in nature, and that the Rules of Court in regard to criminal cases may not be completely applicable there.

To determine the truth, it is proper for the court to hear such testimony and admit such documents, as “it may deem essential and conducive to the ends of justice.” (Senate Resolution No. 39 Adopting the Rules of Procedure on Impeachment Trials, Par. V)

Applying the Rules on Evidence in criminal cases liberally in an impeachment case may mean that all testimonies and documents “essential and conducive to the ends of justice” shall form part of the record and available for the consideration of the senator-judges during their deliberations, and not be forbidden and/or stricken off the record. Such objections together with the supporting arguments made under the rules in criminal case shall be noted and entered into the record of the proceedings.

The senator-judges are intelligent and experienced professionals. Some of them are lawyers and all are perceptive and analytical enough not to be misled by leading questions, hearsay evidence, etc.

It is up to the senator-judges to evaluate (meaning, “make allowance for bias or exaggeration,” or disregard if deserving of no weight, based on the objections and supporting arguments) all the testimony and documents on record.

The impeachment court is said to be supreme in its sphere. Let us have faith that the senator-judges will judge the defendant fairly, in light of such evidence as they find “conducive to the ends of justice,” according to their conscience and mindful of the judgment of history.

—ANTONIO A. AGUSTIN,

dean, nette_m0301@yahoo.com


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: Corona impeachment trial , justice , letters , rules of court , truth

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.


Copyright 2011 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Corona springs waiver on bank funds, BUT…
  • High drama highlights Corona’s day in court
  • Gaga gets away with it
  • Dead ‘Commando’ man stuffed in drum
  • Did you know
  • Sports

  • Ronda hits road today
  • Gems zero in on 2nd semis slot
  • Manny’s fight losing gay patronage
  • ICTSI Tour resumes at Eagle Ridge today
  • Injury-depleted Talk ‘N Text debuts vs Meralco
  • Lifestyle

  • World’s tallest tower, the Tokyo Skytree, opens
  • Fake testicles, facemasks, the new level of pet pampering
  • They flock to the bee farm to be healed
  • My passage to India
  • Why do coincidences happen?
  • Entertainment

  • Lady Gaga: ‘If I get thrown in jail in Manila, Beyonce will bail me out’
  • Lady Gaga tweets about Indonesian concert censorship
  • Disgruntled ex ‘exposes’ controversial affair
  • Filipino film wins in Jeonju
  • Cristine Reyes seeks dismissal of Ara Mina’s libel, grave coercion raps
  • Business

  • UK firms eyeing Philippine infra projects
  • Gov’t rejects all bids for 15-year T-bonds
  • Biz Buzz: Ortigas breakthrough
  • MJCI approves P600M property transfer
  • Housing, auto loans rose 17-18% in 2011
  • Technology

  • Google completes takeover of Motorola Mobility
  • Mobile Web use to rise as phone prices drop
  • Microsoft sees ‘rebirth’ with new Windows 8 system
  • At seventh birthday, YouTube marks new milestones
  • Facebook’s Zuckerberg caps IPO week with wedding
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, May 23, 2012
  • Extreme arrogance
  • Senators also on trial
  • Why do we allow this?
  • Moral of the story
  • Global Nation

  • Foreigner-bashing rises amid China’s domestic woes
  • China accepts 30-40 vans of Philippine bananas—Palace
  • Big exporters of bananas stop shipping to China
  • 71 countries to scrutinize Philippine human rights record in Geneva meet
  • Pacquiao, same-sex marriage and our kumpareng John
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2011 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved