Quantcast

Arroyo is being prosecuted, not persecuted



The few voices crying “persecution” in denouncing the Aquino administration’s move to stop former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s attempt to fly to Singapore don’t seem to understand the difference between “persecution” and “prosecution.”

When a person who is as clean as a whistle with no legal or criminal impediment is harassed, oppressed, punished and deprived of her rights—in particular the right to travel—that is persecution. But when one who is carrying a heavy criminal baggage is stopped from leaving the country, especially when there are strong indications that she has no intention to return, that is in the exercise of the state’s power to prosecute. We call that prosecution, a process by which the state can exact retribution on those suspected, accused and found guilty of crimes.

Arroyo is facing a host of charges—six of which are plunder and graft cases, apart from the electoral sabotage case that has been filed with the Pasay City Regional Trial Court, for which she was arrested last Nov. 18.

Without the issuance of the arrest warrant against her, which placed her under government custody, she could have made her Singapore flight on the strength of a temporary restraining order (TRO) issued by the Supreme Court.

It is to the credit of Justice Secretary Leila de Lima that Arroyo failed to board a plane for Singapore.

De Lima was assailed by the Arroyo camp for “defying” the Supreme Court TRO. But she stood her ground even at the risk of being held in contempt by the tribunal and of not being confirmed by the Commission on Appointments, as a senator had threatened. De Lima has earned public accolade for her feistiness in defense of a righteous cause. Not only LP members of the House of Representatives but also a big throng of citizens have thrown their full support behind her.

The question is: Should we have allowed Arroyo to travel abroad and open the possibility for her to escape prosecution, or should we make sure that she stand trial and, if convicted, pay for her crimes?

Any right-thinking Filipino should stand for justice taking its proper and irreversible course.

—JULLIE ANNE CRISOSTOMO, sexyme2011@hotmail.ph


Follow Us







Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=18149

  • LevyBelaro

    De Lima was doing what is proper and common sense.  Arroyo was obviously fleeing.  And the Supreme Court ???? Is it a Supreme Court of the Philippines or a Supreme Court of GMA? TRO?? Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)… a temporary order of the Supreme Court if followed by De Lima and Pnoy Administration will surely result to Permanent Injustice to the Abused, Fooled and  Plundered Filipino People for almost 10 years of GMA misRule.  GMA must FACE all the cases of Election Cheating and Sabotage, and all the plunder cases that will soon follow… And the Supreme Court??? A very questionable TRO???  very suspicious, very dubious… The Filipino people are not fools!

  • Saloi-CDR

    Good job Ms JULLIE ANNE.

  • Fulpol

    May TRO si Arroyo to travel, pero pinigilan siya ni Hitler De Lima…. hahahahhahaha.. anong tawag dun??? hahahaha…  eh di persecution… hahahahahhaha



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace