Quantcast
Latest Stories

Editorial

Disappointing win


If you want to say Manny’s diminished by this, go ahead,” said fight organizer Bob Arum testily, following the latest Las Vegas slugfest between Manny Pacquiao and Mexican challenger Juan Manuel Marquez that resulted in the most controversial win ever to go the Filipino champ’s way. Arum has an interest in keeping the animosity alive and raging between the Pacquiao and Marquez camps. A fourth fight between the two would surely rake in more millions of dollars for the boxing impresario, and would probably lead to the Holy Grail of world professional boxing today: that elusive dream match between Pacquiao and the only remaining fighter in the planet to perhaps equal (or at least noisily lay claim to) his stature as the greatest pound-for-pound boxer of his time: Floyd Mayweather Jr.

Oscar De La Hoya, too, thinks Pacquiao owes it to his fans worldwide to finally face Mayweather in the ring, however differently his promoters and handlers might feel about the match. “My advice to Manny is, ‘You’re the fighter. You call the shots.’ Pacquiao fights for the people and the people want him to step up and fight Mayweather.” It bears mentioning, incidentally, that De La Hoya is identified by the Los Angeles Times as someone “who helps promote unbeaten Floyd Mayweather Jr.,” and thus has his own stake in seeing that mythical battle come true.

It’s true that legions of Pacquiao’s fans would like to see nothing better than for the soft-spoken but deadly Filipino fighter to put the gasbag Mayweather in his place. But it’s also true that, after the unexpectedly less-than-stellar victory he managed to eke out against Marquez last Sunday, many more people would not want to see Pacquiao back again in the ring so soon, whether in another rematch with Marquez or an epic clash with Mayweather—not in the condition he was in, when he scared the wits out of his fanatically devoted country with a listless, ambiguous performance that showed off a heretofore unfamiliar sight: a vulnerable, rattled Pacquiao.

Perhaps the pre-fight hype from his camp ramped up expectations too much. Pacquiao, assured his handlers, had never trained harder or more fiercely than for this match, intent on demolishing once and for all Marquez’s taunt that he was robbed of victory not just once, but twice, in their first two bouts. Pacquiao, it must be noted, had nothing more to prove at this point; his place in the pantheon of the world’s greatest boxers had been assured, and he needed no Marquez to validate it. The Mexican pugilist was coming in as the underdog with a raging chip on his shoulder. He was 38, near the end of the line for a boxer, bulkier and so was thought to move more sluggishly, and had been putty in the hands of Mayweather. The odds were 10-1 in Pacquiao’s favor.

What everyone thought would be a cakewalk proved, however, to be a sobering experience—not just for a bruised Pacquiao, who after the 12th round had trudged to his corner dejectedly, his body language already accepting defeat, but also for his fans worldwide, many of whom went mute and white at seeing their once invulnerable idol humbled, himself seemingly surprised when the announcement came that he won by a majority. The cold numbers did favor Pacquiao, but, persuasive and definitive as they are in their impartiality, they can only offer cold comfort to those by the ringside and before TV sets whose eyes and instincts told them it was, at the very least, the least convincing of PacMan’s victories. If Marquez, who was pummeled by Mayweather, could flummox him this way, imagine… we dare not voice the thought.

“Wala siya sa kondisyon,” was the assessment of Rolando Navarrete, Philippine boxing’s former “bad boy.” Perhaps Pacquiao has spread himself too thin, with politics and show-biz nipping at the meanness of his game? We’ll leave it to the experts to do a fine-grained dissection of where he came up short. We can only express the prayer that, whatever Pacquiao decides to do moving forward, whether it’s a rematch with Marquez or a showdown with Mayweather, he’d be back in his glorious element, to banish the shadow of this ambivalent moment in his career. He might also want to ponder the notion that, with 15 straight victories under his belt, and billions of dollars to leaven all that hard-won triumph, he’d be pushing his luck to keep stepping into that ring. Newsday sportswriter Marcus Henry has asked the painful question: “After that performance you have to wonder about Pacquiao. How many more great fights does he have in him?”


Follow Us


Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


More from this Column:

Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=17351

Tags: Bob Arum , editorial , Floyd Mayweather Jr , Juan Manuel Marquez , Manny Pacquiao , opinion

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JCQSCTELK5JD5PGRUTANW45ISM Black Panther

    na justify na pagka panalo ni pacman, tinatapakan kc ni JMM  c MANNY p. sa paa during da fight

  • Anonymous

    what most people don’t understand is that marquez did not engage much in the fight and that’s what counter-punchers do.  they wait for the attacker to punch so that they can make use of their counter-punching abilities.  if marquez won’t go on offense, there’s no way he’s gonna take the belt away from a champion.  if marquez wants to win, he should have been more aggressive.  buti nga lumulusob pa si manny eh…  paano kung hindi lumusob si manny at hindi naman nya kailangan lumusob dahil sya yung champion eh…  manny was just supposed to defend his crown.  the fight became boring because it was only manny who came to fight while marquez just waited for manny to attack.  baligtad…  dapat si marquez ang sumusugod kasi sya ang challenger eh….  sana sumugod si marquez di sana bulagta sya ulit.  shucks sayang.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_74IJ43M4WCVK4AO7VJLJ4UZ6BE Robert Carino

    whether or not pacquiao was in top condition, or if marquez should have gone beyond his counterpunching style, or who won do not really matter.  sports should not be limited by our nationality nor should we be forced to choose sides against our wishes.  one of the prime objectives of sports is to bring peoples together, and for us to give honor to whom honor is due.  in my honest opinion, both fighters fought their hearts out last sunday, and this fight will eventually go down in history as one of the classics.  they both deserve credit and our respect.  yun lang po. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3E2JCLQTIDPIMTQMAZQYSJYVLY Ino

    That’s life, some win, some loose, some cry, some quit, some fight, some pray. But in our poor country, crab mentality never goes away.

    • Anonymous

      Ino makes a real pointer…Filipinos always see the ugly side specially when they get disappointed with an outcome far off from their high expectation.

      They feel the whole nation won when a Pacquiao wins by knockout and don’t when it’s not a knockout.

      An attitude out of shape, I surmise.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3E2JCLQTIDPIMTQMAZQYSJYVLY Ino

    Early this evening, ABS-CBN announced proudly the news, “Laglag na si Pakyaw as the world’s No.1 Pound for Pound Fighter,”. Little did they know that the rating is held by Ring Magazine and the Ring announced yesterday that Pacquiao retains his title as No.1 in spite of an un-stellar performance against Marquez. 
    Pulling a good countryman down has always been the trait of business ways in the country. No regard for success of fellowmen, if they don’t get a share. In short, corruption has stayed permanently in heart and mind to the influential some.

  • Anonymous

    Hey dude! Did you watch the HBO film or the Primetime garbage?

  • Anonymous

    Those who herald the downfall of pacquiao do not deserve any respect at all. You should be ashamed with your collectively stupidity and you dare to post your opinion where the citizens and foreigners can read and understand.

    I myself thought Pacquiao lost the fight because of the 2 british gangsters in Primetime TV. One has declared that there will be a massive investigation in the boxing world after that fight. But when my son sent me a copy of HBO, with in-between rounds Compubox figures, and the angles of shot were different than that of Primetime, I immediately convinced that Pacquiao won.

    Before you declare and celebrate on the ”end” of Pacquiao, check first other sources, maybe you were just hoodwinked and led to believe by the british. Be wary of the british, they put themselves as our enemies for some reason that still evade me to-date. 

    Review HBO version and then come back and post your opinion.

  • Anonymous

    It’s a disappointing win but Manny won.  It is on record that Manny did more punches than Marquez,  it is also on record that of the punches made by Manny more punches have landed compared to Marquez.  So the arithmetic is simple as 1 plus 1…

  • Anonymous

    boxers are gladiators; they are not only meant to fight but to entertain; the audience don’t only want their bet to win but to entertain them; manny may laugh his way to the bank but for many of his fans it was not a good win. nevertheless, give credit to manny for always doing his best – but as they say, you cannot always please everybody everytime.



Copyright © 2013, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • It’s Furlough Friday for federal workers
  • Church revenge: Buhay says Catholic vote was key
  • It’s looking like NP’s for Drilon, says Alan Cayetano
  • Substandard maritime schools warned anew
  • 78 massacre suspects face charges over 58th victim
  • Sports

  • Vengeful Beermen destroy Slammers
  • Ateneo goes for sweep
  • Que fires career-low 62, rules Orchard by four
  • Warriors foil Archers; Lions, Chiefs triumph
  • Paragua still leads
  • Lifestyle

  • Read-Along at 6 picks celebs as ambassadors
  • Mt. Pulag revisited: Quo vadis?
  • Healthy gorilla born to 1st time parents at US zoo
  • US teen takes Danish supermodel to prom
  • Ninoy Aquino’s birthday is ‘Day of Reading’
  • Entertainment

  • Julie Delpy on life at 40
  • It takes two to do the show biz breakup cha-cha
  • Juday: Violence against women unacceptable
  • PH cineastes celebrate in the French Riviera
  • Stone Temple Pilots sue ex-frontman Scott Weiland
  • Business

  • Coco sugar sweetens small town’s finances
  • Along Mt. Bulusan’s foothills: A balmy ‘agricultural resort’
  • For Mona Serrano, there is no ‘escape’ from entrepreneurship
  • Buildings designed with unique character finding market
  • 18 Avon top sellers get a car each in ‘lipstick red’ shade
  • Technology

  • A new way for Filipinos to connect on social media launched
  • Statement of Smart Communications
  • Yahoo takes big leap with $1.1B deal for Tumblr
  • Poll: More US teens turn to Twitter; Facebook old
  • Tips to avoid becoming an identity theft victim
  • Opinion

  • Deep impact
  • The return of traditional politics in Pampanga
  • Most important investment incentive
  • Making (and keeping) friends
  • The Trinity and us
  • Global Nation

  • Sky lanterns light up Iloilo sky, set world record
  • Filipino WWII veterans used to cover up for senators’ inaction on family unification
  • Warship from US here next month
  • Taiwan has new terms
  • Taipei welcomes start of fisheries talks with PH
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved