There’s The Rub

The living and the dead


There’s a horror story to scare us out of our wits today. No, it’s not any movie that’s currently showing in our movie houses. And no, it’s not the ongoing bloodletting in the South if you want a horror story from real life, even if the faces of the Muslim women that appeared here last weekend, all haggard with anxiety, adding deeper furrows into faces already furrowed by age, are horrific enough in themselves.

It’s global warming.

That term almost makes it sound anticlimactic. It’s such a benign way to refer to a planet in peril, to a threatened apocalypse, to the making of a day devoted to visiting the dead redundant.

A news item came out Monday that drove home the point.

Richard Muller, a prominent skeptic of global warming, spent two years studying the data to prove the doomsayers wrong only to discover that they were right. The earth is heating up, its land mass in particular now being 1.6 degrees Fahrenheit hotter than it was in the 1950s. Muller is set to deliver his findings this week.

The community that has been warning about climate change is unimpressed though it welcomes his corroboration. “After lots of work he found exactly what was already known and accepted in the climate community,” says Jerry North, the atmospheric sciences professor who headed a National Academy of Sciences climate science review in 2006. “I am hoping his study will have a positive impact. But some folks will never change.”

There’s no longer any reason to be skeptical about rising temperatures, Muller wrote in the Wall Street Journal, a bastion of skeptical thinking about global warming. Which is the reason his study is making waves, if not exactly whipping up a tsunami. His study however does not address the causes of global warming or suggest ways of counteracting it.

Still, he said, the world would do well to reduce carbon emissions caused by fossil fuels. “Greenhouse gases could have a disastrous impact on the world.”

Just how disastrous it could be, a group of scientists and environmental activists pointed out a month and a half ago. Led by Al Gore, the best president the United States never had who gained fame with “An Inconvenient Truth,” they held a day-long marathon show called “24 Hours of Reality,” which was streamed worldwide via Internet. The event drew in representatives from 24 locations across the globe whose job was to “connect the dots between the changing climate and extreme weather.” It featured our very own Rodne Galicha, a 32-year-old environmental activist from Sibuyan Island, Romblon. He held his own in the distinguished company.

He began by drawing attention to the humongous catastrophes that have beset the world of late: massive floods in Pakistan, Australia, even Mississippi and North Dakota; mudslides in Korea; droughts in Brazil, Mexico and Syria; unrelenting rains in China, Fiji, Colombia and the Philippines; rising temperatures, increasing water vapor over the oceans, and growing intensity of rainstorms and snow storms.

He ended by saying: “If we are unable to act, with this phenomenon, we are committing suicide; for the next generation, we are committing homicide. Homo sapiens has now become the most critically endangered species of all time.”

All this merely confirms what our senses have been telling us for some time now. There’s no denying global warming, there’s no denying climate change, there’s no denying a dying planet. Monumental catastrophes have happened in the past, some more catastrophic than the ones we see today. But not as plentifully, not as frequently, not as universally harshly. Quakes and tsunamis violently rocking various parts of the world, laying low even a powerful country like Japan; hurricanes and tornadoes howling in the American heartland and elsewhere; super storms and floods devastating countries in Southeast Asia, the Philippines at the frontline of them: You don’t have to believe in the Mayan prediction of an apocalyptic event ravaging the earth next Christmas to be very, very afraid.

As it is, we’re already thanking heaven a storm did not waylay our visit to the cemeteries today. A thing we may not count on in years to come. Galicha himself contends that it’s the poor countries like ours that are taking the brunt of the effects of global warming.

Can we stop the complacency, the indifference, the cynicism that are pushing humankind to the brink?


But unfortunately that is not just something we can do on our own, even if we had the will to do it. It takes global effort of the kind Gore and company are spearheading. It is no small irony that the rich countries continue to preach the infinite wonders of globalism while being the very obstacle to real globalism, the kind where the peoples of the world unite to take global action to save the planet. They’re the ones who insist that even if the planet is warming, they have nothing to do with it, it’s a natural cycle of life, the earth has immense powers of recuperation, left to itself it will right things in the end. An argument unfortunately that nobody can win: You prove them wrong, you still lose.

Galicha is right, it’s time we added our voices to those protesting the complacency, the indifference, the cynicism of the greedy—yes, the greedy, as Occupy Wall Street so rightly puts it—before we end up being merely the voices of the damned. Like Galicha, it’s time we told countries like the United States that have remained stumbling blocks to global accords to fight off global warming: “From the Pacific islands, from the global South, we don’t need your money. What we need is climate justice.  Decrease your emissions.”

Homo sapiens is the one species now most threatened with extinction. We don’t act to reverse this, we blur the line between the living and the dead.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • sugbu

    Again,another unending debate will ensure out of this inconclusive idea or hypothesis.

  • TheGUM

    Yeah, those “so-called first world inhabitants…sucking up that million barrels of oil in less than an hour or so…use it to run the 4wds, lawnmowers, blowers, etc including…including…VIBRATORS!”
    And all those TVs, computers, Ipads, Iphones…people don’t have time for some decent, good old fashion sex anymore! 
    We have to have alternative forms of energy, so we can watch TV, use our laptops, otherwise we will have more kids!  The RH bill should include FREE ELECTRICITY, otherwise we’ll be reproducing like rats! 
    Pass the RH bill now, but with free electricity!  For everybody, not just for the rich!  Stop fossil fuel use, down with Shell, Petron, Napocor…but wait, if the lights are out and there’s nothing to do, people might have wanton sex all over the place!

    It’s so complicated!  I want to lower my carbon footprint, but my wife is so sexy!  It’s either we buy condoms, or we will be part of SWS’s hungry Filipinos survey!  Sex or food?  A false dichotomy!  It should be both!  Down with capitalism!

  • Anonymous

    consume less and wisely, one of the solutions

  • Anonymous

    With the resistance of the wealthy nations like the US to a concerted effort against global warming and while waiting for this selfish countries to come to their senses,  one of the options  open to us to help slow down  climate change is to pass the RH Bill pronto. More people means more emissions, 
    less flora to absorb pollution and more garbage all of which hasten global warming. I believe that not even the anti-RH Bill advocates who choose to believe that climate change is the product of malicious minds could deny that with less people, there would be less garbage and less pollution which in
    themselves are good for everyone. The second positive achievement of passing the RH Bill visavis climate change is there would be lesser children to share in the grim situation brought about or made even fiercer by the alteration in the temperatures of the Earth. Do we want more babies to go through Ondoys? Do we want more  children to go hungry on account of prolonged droughts triggered by climate change? I am not proposing that we stop procreating altogether. All I am saying is that let us not compound the near hopeless situation by  bringing into the world babies at the prevailing rate. Let’s slow down the birth rate because  it is the height of cruelty to knowingly expose the young to danger and deprivation.  

    Of course, it will take more Richard Mullers and more Ondoys for the CBCP and other enemies of the RH Bill to accept the reality that we live in an a world that is becoming increasingly hostile to humans especially to the young but shall we allow them who have no children dictate the kind of world our children would live in? We cannot expect that these people who are deluding themselves that the
    command  given by  God to Adam and Eve to go ye and multiply when the world was still a paradise is still in effect now that the Earth is dying to change their minds all of  sudden  so the right thing to do is to seize the future of our children from their hands.   


    • pinoynusa

      How stupid can you get? How can a piece of legislation still up for votes have any achievements?

      Anti-Catholic freethinker you are.

  • Pablo

    I am of the opinion that while the effort to dampen global warming is noteworthy nevertheless the world and even the universe is destined to be hotter to the point that it will melt.
    I believe that that Someone who is outside of the domain of time is able to tell us what will be down the road of human history even before they happen nor the slightest indications even shows up.
    For somewhere in the Holy Scripture the following is written destined to come to pass:
    “The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.
    Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming. That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the heat.” 2 Peter 3:10-12

  • Jimmy Munar

    Planet earth is deteriorating. You may delay it but NOBODY can stop it…! ! Yoy want to stop it ????? Then reduce the earth population by NINETY PERCENT… STOP THE PRODUCTION OF OIL AND GAS, AND BAN ALL KINDS OF MINING…. ONLY THEN WILL THE EARTH REPLENISH ITSELF…! ! ! !

  • markx

    triggered by too much production of goods for an over populated earth.
    among the solution of this “climate change phenomenon” is POPULATION CONTROL!

  • jon a

    The nice thing about being a developing country, is that we have the opportunity to choose what forms of energy to support. Developed countries are like crack addicts, except in this case, their crack cocaine is fossil fuel energy. Their economies are designed for that purpose. They have lobby groups heavily invested in continued fossil fuel usage.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks